Let me say something that a lot of people are thinking but are afraid to say out loud — because once you see it, you can't unsee it.
There is no funding for YOUR healthcare. Not enough, anyway. People are rationing insulin. Skipping cancer screenings. Going into bankruptcy over emergency room bills. Politicians have been "working on it" for decades. The money, we're told, just isn't there.
There is no funding for YOUR housing. Millions of families are one missed paycheck away from losing their home. Rents have doubled. Shelters are full. First-time buyers have been priced out of the market entirely. We're told the budget is too tight.
There is no funding for YOU — for your schools, your roads, your mental health services, your retirement, your community. Cuts, cuts, cuts. Austerity, austerity, austerity. Not enough money. Belt-tightening time.
And then, like magic — the money appears.
There is no funding for YOUR housing. Millions of families are one missed paycheck away from losing their homes. Rents have doubled. Shelters are full. First-time buyers have been priced out of the market entirely. We're told the budget is too tight.
There is unlimited funding for THEIR wars. Trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a T — spent on endless military campaigns in countries most Americans couldn't find on a map. No debate. No hesitation. The checkbook opens immediately.
There is unlimited funding for THEIR tax cuts. Every few years, a new round of cuts that overwhelmingly benefit the wealthiest individuals and corporations, while the rest of us are told that social programs are "unsustainable."
There is unlimited money for THEM — for their lobbyists, their campaigns, their golden parachutes, their insider trading, their subsidized industries, their offshore accounts.
This isn't a left vs. right issue. This is a top vs. bottom issue. This is about who the system was built to serve — and who it was built to extract from.
The next time a politician tells you we "simply can't afford" to take care of our own people, ask them: compared to what? Because the money exists. It has always existed. The question is whose priorities it funds.

No comments:
Post a Comment