Friday, March 13, 2026

A 28-year-old DOGE bro with zero experience in research, or peer review just admitted under oath that he canceled over $100 million in federal research funding because some projects mentioned the word "LGBTQ." He didn't even read a single book first.
Nathan Cavanaugh, a former startup bro turned DOGE operative, testified in a January deposition that he and a colleague from the investment banking world personally reviewed hundreds of grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
They created lists labeled "Craziest Grants" and "Other Bad Grants" and used ChatGPT to scan project descriptions for keywords like "gay," "BIPOC," "indigenous," and "tribal."
When asked why a program examining the experiences of LGBTQ military veterans was flagged for cancellation, Cavanaugh's entire explanation was: "Because it explicitly says LGBTQ." A project mentioning "feminist and queer insights" got axed for the same reason. Not fraud. Not waste. Just words that made them uncomfortable.
When the attorney asked what qualified him to make these decisions, Cavanaugh said a person could have "enough judgment from reading books." When asked which books, he admitted there were none.
Among the casualties: a documentary about Jewish women's slave labor during the Holocaust, an archival project on Italian American history, efforts to preserve endangered Native American languages, and a museum that needed a new HVAC system.
The entire process resulted in the termination of 97% of the agency's grants. DOGE staffers pressured the NEH to move faster, with one writing: "We're getting pressure from the top on this and we'd prefer that you remain on our side."
Cavanaugh also insisted the cuts were about reducing the deficit. When asked if they actually reduced the deficit, he admitted they did not.
No expertise. No books. No deficit reduction. Just a couple of guys in their twenties and a grudge against the word "queer," destroying careers and erasing history.
This is what "government efficiency" looks like.

 


 
Rising tensions across the Middle East following recent military confrontations with Iran are beginning to reshape regional alliances, and new reports suggest that two of Washington’s key partners may be drawing a clear line. Officials indicate that Egypt and Jordan are signaling they may not allow the United States to use their territory for operations against Tehran, a move that could significantly affect strategic planning in the region. Both countries have long maintained close military cooperation with Washington and have played important diplomatic roles in Middle Eastern affairs for decades. However, according to sources familiar with the situation, leaders in Cairo and Amman are becoming increasingly cautious about being pulled directly into a conflict that could spiral into a much larger regional crisis. With fears growing that a broader war could destabilize neighboring countries, strain fragile economies, and inflame domestic tensions, both governments appear determined to avoid actions that might place them on the front lines of a potential confrontation with Iran. The situation highlights the delicate balance regional leaders must maintain between longstanding security partnerships with the United States and the urgent need to protect stability within their own borders as geopolitical tensions continue to escalate across the Middle East.

Well shit beans folks! I am absolutely gobsmacked that when I criticize traitors who tried to overthrow our government that I am demonstrating contempt for the traitors and the Washington Post is supporting them.

How quickly a news institution can fall by simply by putting just one moron in charge of it. In this case Bezos put several morons in at the Washington Post and they were imbecilic enough to think this was something that needed to be said.

What is coming tomorrow I wonder?

'In other news, water was just discovered to be wet.'

'Man walked on the moon, maybe.'

I am not merely demonstrating contempt for the orange shitdemon, I am demonstrating absolute hatred for the traitor. I want him to shed his mortal coil. I want the people who voted for him to get something metastatic in their anal canal.

I want the people who put him in our house to understand how stupid they are right before they shed their mortal coil and visit with Satan where they belong.

There is absolutely nothing good about one person who voted for them. Recognize that editorial board and remember this is why 250,000 people unsubscribed to your right-wing horse shit Trump licking factory.

I have nothing but contempt for YOU editorial board and I will celebrate cancelling my 27 years subscription and personally take full responsibility myself that *I* was the one subscriber who caused you to go out of business, and I was happy to put all of you Trump nut suckers the hell out of business.

~True Blue


 

Thursday, March 12, 2026

 

A Former Qatari Prime Minister Just Warned The Gulf It's Fighting Someone Else's War. And The Weapons Profits Are Going Elsewhere.

Former Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani has delivered one of the most consequential warnings to emerge from the Gulf region since Operation Epic Fury began. His message to GCC states is direct and historically grounded — you are being drawn into a lose-lose proxy conflict that benefits outside powers far more than it benefits the Middle East. HBJ argued that the United States could ultimately step back from the confrontation while continuing to profit by selling weapons to multiple parties — a pattern he suggests echoes long-standing Western strategies of maintaining regional division to preserve external leverage and arms market dominance.

His invocation of a broader regional reshaping agenda has added significant controversy to remarks that were already generating intense discussion among Gulf political elites. The warning arrives at a particularly sensitive moment for Qatar which firmly rejected Iranian claims that missile strikes hitting residential areas in Doha were accidental. Despite those attacks HBJ represents a significant segment of Gulf leadership that believes direct confrontation with Iran will drain regional wealth, destabilize fragile economies and leave Arab states weakened while foreign defense industries collect the financial rewards.

Senator Lindsey Graham has already called for rapid Saudi-Israeli normalization once the conflict ends — a development critics like HBJ argue reveals exactly whose strategic interests this war is actually designed to serve.


 
'Palantir CEO Alex Karp thinks his AI technology will lessen the power of “highly educated, often female voters, who vote mostly Democrat” while increasing the power of working-class men.
“This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”
This sounds like a direct, long-term pitch to the GOP from a CEO whose tech firm already has numerous government contracts and is deeply embedded in the Pentagon. Karp’s message is loud and clear: My technology will take political capital away from one of your greatest enemies—liberal women with degrees—and give one of your favorite demographics to patronize—working-class men—more political power to transfer to you. He’s aligning his technology with both GOP political strategy and the larger male-centered culture war that the right has been waging for the better part of a decade now. And how exactly would his technology only hurt Democrat women?'









 

 GLOBAL ECONOMIC SHOCK: HOW IRAN'S MISSILES JUST SENT THE WORLD'S BANKERS TO THE BASEMENT
🔹 The 1970s Called — They Want Their Energy Crisis Back
There is an old proverb: "What goes around comes around." In 2026, what came around was an energy shock so severe that analysts have stopped reaching for their thesauruses and started reaching for their blood pressure medication.
"We still have what the Wall Street Journal referred to yesterday as the most severe energy crisis since the 70s," a CNBC analyst declared from the Future Proof conference in Miami, causing the room to collectively choke on its overpriced coffee .
The Strait of Hormuz, that narrow artery through which one-fifth of the world's oil flows, has effectively become a parking lot. Traffic is at a virtual halt. And when the Strait closes, it doesn't just affect Iran's roughly 4.6 million barrels per day — it threatens supply from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iraq, Kuwait, and Qatar combined. That is a volume the global market cannot simply replace .
As one observer put it: "It's like discovering your entire diet consisted of one bakery, and that bakery just caught fire. Now everyone is hungry and pointing fingers."
🔹 Oil at $100 — The New Normal Nobody Ordered
Brent crude has surged past $100 a barrel for the first time in nearly four years, rising more than 60% since the conflict began . WTI has climbed over 75% . These are not numbers. These are the sound of every finance minister on earth updating their résumés.
The International Energy Agency, in a move that can best be described as "closing the barn door after the horse has bolted," announced the largest coordinated release of strategic reserves in history — 400 million barrels. The U.S. will contribute 172 million barrels from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve .
Analysts at Macquarie crunched the numbers and delivered the kind of verdict that makes optimists weep: the release covers roughly three weeks of the volume that normally transits through the Strait. Their conclusion: "If that doesn't sound like much, it isn't" .
As one energy trader put it: "It's like trying to put out a forest fire with a garden hose. Noble intention. Utterly useless result."
🔹 Citibank's Three-Day Vacation: When Bankers Become Ghosts
If you had told anyone six months ago that Iran's missiles would drive American bankers out of Dubai, they would have laughed. They are not laughing now.
Citibank announced the temporary closure of its branches and financial centers across the United Arab Emirates from March 12 to 14 as a precautionary measure following explicit threats from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to attack "economic centers and banks" affiliated with US and Israeli entities .
The bank's Mall of the Emirates branch will remain operational — presumably because even war has shopping. The rest? Closed. Shuttered. Empty. The kind of empty that usually precedes a panic.
Citibank offered its UAE-based employees the option to work remotely, including from locations outside the country . Translation: "If you can get out, get out. If you can't, work from your bathtub."
The bank anticipates reopening on March 16, assuming the missiles cooperate . It's the first time in modern history that a global bank has scheduled its operations around ballistic missile trajectories.
🔹 The Tech Exodus: When Google Goes Dark
Citibank was just the beginning. The IRGC, through its Tasnim News Agency, released a list of American technology companies it considers legitimate targets — including Google, Microsoft, Palantir, IBM, Nvidia, and Oracle . These companies have offices in Israel and the Gulf. They now have targets painted on their doors.
Google immediately shifted all regional staff to mandatory work-from-home until further notice . A Google executive explained: "All employees across the region, apart from critical staff responsible for maintaining cloud infrastructure, had been shifted to mandatory work-from-home — that continues" .
The irony is exquisite: the very cloud that holds the world's data is now being maintained by people hiding in their apartments, hoping the next missile doesn't have their Wi-Fi address.
Microsoft, Palantir, and others followed suit. The Dubai International Financial Centre, once the gleaming heart of Gulf capitalism, now resembles a ghost town with better architecture.
🔹 The "Work from Anywhere" Policy — Literally Anywhere
American financial institutions have taken the "work from anywhere" concept to its logical extreme. Employees are being encouraged to work from overseas wherever they feel safe .
One person with direct knowledge of the situation told The Economic Times: "American financial institutions have asked employees not to come to the office temporarily until further orders. In some cases, employees are also being encouraged to work from overseas wherever they feel safe" .
Translation: "If you can get to Bali, go to Bali. If you can make it to the Maldives, we'll expense the flight. Just don't be in Dubai when the missiles arrive."
The phrase "business continuity plan" has taken on a whole new meaning. It now includes "prayer" as a core component.
🔹 The 1970s Playbook: Inflation, Recession, and Despair
Harvard economist Gita Gopinath, formerly of the IMF, delivered the kind of warning that makes central bankers reach for antacids:
"The world doesn't have the fiscal capacity to respond to any downturn caused by a prolonged oil shock" .
Crude oil now looks more likely to average $75 a barrel this year than the $65 figure built into many forecasts. That 15% difference is enough to reduce global growth by 0.1 to 0.2 percentage points and raise global inflation by 0.5 percentage points .
The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index stands at 56.4 — firmly in recessionary territory . Readings below 60 historically correspond to periods of significant economic stress. The index has spent most of the past year below that threshold.
As one economist put it: "Consumers are feeling it at the pump, feeling it in their utility bills, and feeling it in their grocery carts. The only thing not feeling it is the missile launchers, and they're having the time of their lives."
🔹 The Strait of Hormuz: 20% of Global Oil, 100% of Global Headaches
The Strait of Hormuz carries about 20% of the world's oil and gas . When it stops, the world notices.
LNG is 100% dependent on the Strait . Oil can sometimes be rerouted. Gas cannot. As analyst Saul Kavonic explained: "Even if the US and other Western countries deploy warships to escort tankers, shipping would still not return quickly to normal. The convoy system will be inherently slower than what prevailed previously, and gas could be impacted a lot more than oil" .
In plain English: even if the shooting stops, the ships won't start moving at normal speed for weeks. And gas? Gas will take even longer.
🔹 The Asian Nightmare: Closer to the Fire, Further from Relief
Asia is feeling the heat most acutely. Most of the oil transported through the Strait is destined for Asian markets . China, Japan, South Korea, India — all heavily dependent on imports that are no longer moving.
Francis Lun of Venturesmart Asia in Hong Kong warned: "For countries in East Asia, except for Malaysia and Indonesia, everybody else is a net importer of oil. That will create inflationary pressure and economic damage. Economic growth will slow and inflation will pick up. This is the worst case scenario" .
Air cargo transport costs from Asia to Europe have increased 45% since the conflict began . Ships are being rerouted, delayed, or simply stopped. Supply chains that took decades to build are unraveling in days.
🔹 The European Crisis: Gas at €115 and Factories Closing
Europe, still recovering from the 2022 energy crisis, is staring into the abyss. Natural gas futures rose 60% over the past week .
Professor Thierry Bros of Sciences Po University, France, warned: "If gas prices exceed €115 per megawatt-hour, some European factories may be forced to shut down and relocate production to the United States" .
In 2022, Europe spent over €4.6 trillion on energy subsidies. Those days are gone. The fiscal space has been "completely depleted," as Gopinath put it .
🔹 The American Reality: $3.41 Gas and Rising
Even America, now the world's largest oil producer, cannot escape. The average gasoline price is now $3.41 per gallon, up from $2.98 a week earlier . That may not sound catastrophic, but it's the direction that matters. And the direction is up.
As one analyst noted: "The globalized nature of the oil market means no country is completely immune. When the Middle East sneezes, the world catches a very expensive cold."
🔹 The Bottom Line: The Old Oil Game Is Back
Elliott Abrams, who served as special envoy for Iran and Venezuela during Trump's first term, summed it up perfectly:
"The old oil game is back, in a much stronger way than we imagined" .
Oil is not just a commodity. It is a weapon. It is a tool of geopolitical pressure. It is the thing that makes empires rise and fall. And right now, it is making the global economy shiver.
The 1970s crisis was triggered by an Arab oil embargo. Today's crisis is triggered by Iranian missiles. The players have changed. The game has not.
As Meghan O'Sullivan, former deputy national security adviser, observed: "Energy has always been a tool of international policy, but in the current context, it is both a tool and a strategic objective" .
The world wanted to move beyond oil. Oil had other plans.
🔹 The Final Word: An Empty Bucket, A Dry Udder, and A Very Long Walk
The cow is dry. The udder is empty. The milking spree that sustained the global economy for eighty years is over — not because Washington decided to stop, but because the cows finally woke up.
Citibank is closed. Google is dark. The Strait is empty. And oil at $100 is just the appetizer. The main course is $150. Dessert is $200. And the global economy is about to discover that it has no room for seconds.
As the proverb says: "You don't know the value of water until the well runs dry." The well is dry. The bucket is empty. And the world is about to embark on a very long, very expensive walk.