Monday, February 23, 2026

 
This morning in Brussels, NATO confirmed that Canada has formally requested Article 4 consultations — a serious step that allows member states to meet when they believe their security or sovereignty is threatened. This is only the seventh time Article 4 has ever been invoked — and the first time it has been used over concerns about another NATO member.
Canada did not name the United States directly, but its request references statements questioning Canadian sovereignty and threats to review NORAD. Canada is asking NATO to reaffirm member sovereignty, review North American defense stability, and explore backup intelligence and defense coordination if U.S.–Canada cooperation weakens.
Several NATO countries — including the UK, France, Germany, and others — have expressed support for consultations. The White House dismissed the move as political, while the Pentagon signaled it would participate constructively, revealing internal U.S. divisions.
This puts Washington in a difficult position: engaging validates Canada’s concerns, while rejecting the process risks isolating the U.S. within its own alliance.
Three possible outcomes: the U.S. retreats under alliance pressure, NATO becomes internally divided, or Canada gradually realigns its defense relationships toward Europe.
What happens next could shape the future of NATO and Western security.

 

 The Russian Civil War, Foreign Intervention, and the Myth of Wall Street Control
The Russian Revolution and Civil War (1917–1921) remain among the most dramatic political collapses in modern history. Because the period was chaotic, secretive, and violent, it has generated many theories — some supported by evidence, others not.
I. The Bolsheviks and War Communism (1918–1921)
After seizing power in October 1917, the Bolsheviks faced:
• World War I collapse
• Economic breakdown
• Civil war against anti-Bolshevik forces
• Foreign military intervention
To survive, they implemented War Communism, which included:
• Nationalization of major industries
• Abolition of private trade
• Forced grain requisition from peasants
• Centralized control of banks
• Strict state distribution of goods
This resulted in:
• Hyperinflation
• Collapse of the monetary system
• Urban depopulation
• Severe famine
There was widespread confiscation of property belonging to nobles, clergy, merchants, and political opponents.
This is well documented in Soviet archives and mainstream scholarship.
II. The Red Terror
In 1918, following assassination attempts and internal unrest, the Bolsheviks launched the Red Terror:
• Political repression through the Cheka (secret police)
• Arrests and executions of perceived “class enemies”
• Confiscation of property
• Suppression of dissent
The Red Terror was a brutal consolidation of power. It did involve seizure of wealth from elites. However, historical evidence shows these resources were primarily used to sustain the regime and its war effort — not to finance foreign bankers.
III. Foreign Nationals in the Red Army
The Red Army included non-Russian fighters, most notably:
• Latvian Riflemen (who played an important role in early Bolshevik security)
• Former Austro-Hungarian POWs
• Some Hungarians, Germans, and Chinese workers
However:
• Most were stranded prisoners of war after World War I.
• Many joined for ideological, political, or survival reasons.
• They were not primarily mercenaries funded by foreign capital.
The claim that 200,000 foreign mercenaries were paid by Western financiers is not supported by mainstream academic research.
IV. Allied Intervention in the Russian Civil War
Several foreign powers intervened against the Bolsheviks:
• Britain
• France
• United States
• Japan
• The Czechoslovak Legion
Their motivations included:
• Preventing German access to Russian resources
• Protecting Allied war supplies
• Attempting to reopen the Eastern Front
• Containing Bolshevism
However:
• The intervention was limited and inconsistent.
• Western governments were war-weary after World War I.
• There was no unified strategy to restore the Tsar or decisively defeat the Bolsheviks.
• Allied withdrawal occurred largely due to domestic political pressure and lack of commitment — not because Bolsheviks repaid debts.
V. Wall Street and the Bolsheviks
Wall Street and the Russian Revolution by Richard B. Spence examines financial interactions between Western bankers and revolutionary Russia.
Spence argues:
• Some American and British financiers engaged pragmatically with Bolshevik authorities.
• There were complex financial dealings involving gold and bonds.
• Certain business interests sought opportunities amid chaos.
However:
• There is no strong archival evidence that Washington financed the Bolshevik Revolution.
• There is no proof that Wall Street orchestrated Russia’s collapse.
• Western investors actually lost enormous sums when the Bolsheviks repudiated Tsarist debt in 1918.
If Western elites had intended to profit from the Revolution, the immediate outcome was largely financial loss.
VI. Confiscation and “Asset Stripping”
During War Communism:
• Aristocratic estates were seized.
• Church valuables were confiscated (notably in 1922).
• Palaces and museums were appropriated by the state.
• Banks were nationalized.
There was chaos, corruption, and some looting.
Estimates of hundreds of millions of dollars in seized valuables appear in historical discussions. However:
• Most confiscated wealth remained under Soviet state control.
• There is no reliable evidence that these assets were systematically transferred to Western financial institutions as repayment.
VII. What Can Be Concluded
Historically Supported
• The Bolsheviks confiscated wealth.
• The Red Terror involved repression and expropriation.
• Foreign nations intervened in the Civil War.
• Some Western financiers had limited financial dealings with the new regime.
Not Supported by Strong Evidence
• That Wall Street engineered or financed the Bolshevik Revolution.
• That Red Terror wealth was used to pay American bankers.
• That 200,000 foreign mercenaries were funded by Western capital.
VIII. Philosophical Reflection: Revolution and Power
The Russian Civil War illustrates a recurring historical pattern:
Revolutions often dismantle existing elites — but replace them with new hierarchies.
The Bolsheviks destroyed:
• Aristocratic privilege
• Church authority
• Private capital
• Traditional social hierarchy
They created:
• Party bureaucracy
• Centralized state power
• Political repression
• A new ruling class
Rather than making Russia “amendable to capitalism,” the Bolsheviks constructed a state-controlled economic system that remained fundamentally anti-capitalist until reforms decades later.
Final Assessment
The Russian Civil War was primarily the result of:
• World War I exhaustion
• Economic collapse
• Political radicalization
• State breakdown
• Ideological extremism
Foreign opportunism existed. Financial entanglements occurred. But the claim of a coordinated Western conspiracy to fund Bolshevism and destroy Russia is not supported by strong documentary evidence.
History is often tragic enough without adding hidden puppet masters.

Actor Martin Sheen recently criticized Donald Trump, urging him to reconnect with what Sheen described as a sense of basic humanity. He also accused members of Trump’s inner circle of reinforcing behavior he views as harmful, calling on the former president to distance himself from advisers he characterized as loyalists rather than candid voices.
The comments quickly gained traction across media and social platforms, sparking strong reactions from across the political spectrum. Supporters of Sheen say he is voicing concerns shared by many Americans, while critics contend that celebrities often wade into political debates in ways that can intensify polarization.
The moment highlights the increasingly close overlap between entertainment and politics — and raises a broader question: when public figures from outside government speak out so directly about elected leaders, do they shape public opinion or deepen existing divides?

 

 
The Quiet Weapon of Evil: Bonhoeffer on Stupidity and Moral Responsibility
There is evil in the world. Not merely as myth or metaphor, but as historical reality. Wars, genocides, corruption, and betrayal testify to its presence. Good people often believe their duty is to stand against evil — to resist injustice, defend truth, and protect the vulnerable.
But evil rarely appears, announcing itself.
It adapts.
It hides.
Not only that, but it infiltrates.
And sometimes, it does not conquer through hatred — but through something far more subtle.
It works through stupidity.
Bonhoeffer’s Disturbing Insight
While imprisoned by the Nazi regime in 1943, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote a short but powerful reflection on what he called “the theory of stupidity.” He had witnessed how an advanced, educated society could descend into moral catastrophe under Adolf Hitler. The question haunted him:
How could so many intelligent people cooperate with something so destructive?
His conclusion was unsettling.
He wrote that stupidity is more dangerous than malice. Evil intentions can be confronted. A malicious person can be exposed or restrained. But a stupid person — in his sense — cannot be reached by argument. Facts do not penetrate. Evidence does not persuade. Contradictions do not disturb.
Why?
Because this kind of stupidity is not a lack of intelligence.
It is the surrender of independent moral judgment.
Stupidity Is Not Low IQ
Bonhoeffer did not mean uneducated people.
He did not mean simple-mindedness.
He did not mean people who disagree with us.
In fact, highly intelligent people can become “stupid” in his sense.
For him, stupidity was a moral and social condition. It occurs when individuals:
• Allow a movement, ideology, or leader to think for them
• Replace critical reasoning with slogans
• Surrender personal responsibility for the comfort of belonging
Under the influence of power — especially authoritarian power — people can become strangely detached from reality. They repeat phrases without reflection. They defend contradictions without discomfort. They act without examining consequences.
At that point, evil no longer needs to force them.
It operates through them.
The Social Nature of Stupidity
Bonhoeffer believed stupidity is not primarily an individual defect. It is socially produced.
When power rises — political, religious, cultural — it often demands conformity. In such environments:
• Dissent feels dangerous
• Doubt feels disloyal
• Questioning feels like betrayal
The pressure to belong can be stronger than the desire for truth.
And so ordinary people — even good people — surrender their autonomy.
This is why evil can infiltrate institutions, including churches and religious communities. It does not enter necessarily through overt wickedness. It enters through unexamined loyalty, through fear of exclusion, through the comfort of group identity.
The danger is not that “stupid people exist.”
The danger is that anyone can become stupid under the right conditions.
Why Argument Often Fails
One of Bonhoeffer’s most sobering observations is that stupidity resists correction. When someone has surrendered their independent thinking to a collective identity, logical debate can feel like a personal attack.
Facts become threats.
Reason becomes hostility.
Correction becomes persecution.
In such cases, the issue is not ignorance but identity. The person is psychologically and socially invested in the belief system. To question it would mean questioning their belonging.
And belonging is powerful.
The Puppet Problem
Bonhoeffer warned that a person in this state becomes easily manipulated. Guided by fear, stirred by outrage, steered by propaganda — they move predictably.
They may believe they are acting freely.
But they are reacting.
Evil, then, does not always need monsters. It needs uncritical participants.
History shows this clearly. Totalitarian systems, mass movements, and ideological fanaticism do not survive on cruelty alone. They survive on ordinary people who stop asking questions.
The Hardest Truth: No One Is Immune
The most uncomfortable part of Bonhoeffer’s insight is this:
Stupidity is not something that only affects “other people.”
It can affect us.
Whenever we:
• Stop examining our own side
• Dismiss disagreement without reflection
• Prefer belonging to truth
• Repeat ideas we have not tested
We risk surrendering the very responsibility that protects us from becoming instruments of harm.
The line between good and evil does not only run through governments or institutions.
It runs through each conscience.
The Antidote
If stupidity is a social surrender of responsibility, then its remedy is not humiliation or mockery.
It is courage.
The courage to think independently.
The courage to question even those we admire.
The courage to stand alone if necessary.
Bonhoeffer himself embodied this courage. As a Lutheran pastor, he resisted Nazi control of the German church and ultimately joined the resistance movement. For this, he was executed in 1945.
His warning was not theoretical. It was lived.
Final Reflection
Evil does not only shout. Sometimes it whispers. Sometimes it persuades. Sometimes it comforts.
It thrives where responsibility fades.
The greatest danger may not be malicious villains. It may be the quiet surrender of independent thought in the name of security, loyalty, or belonging.
The question, then, is not simply:
“Who is evil?”
But:
“Where have I stopped thinking for myself?”
That question — asked honestly — may be the beginning of resistance.

Quote of the Week
Amid all the turmoil of this past week, I believe this quote by Joe Klein is the most cogent.
There is so much flak that gets thrown up every single day that we can sometimes miss the big picture. And the big picture is that there is no area of public life that holds good options now for Donald Trump and his mob. They have spent all their capital and are now operating on fumes. They are in the final months before elections, and they will clearly not be able to stop them and hold power. Though the wreckage is burning, and the smoke is in our eyes we have to be able to see the larger truth: that the dictatorship was not consolidated. He and his band of fascists made war on this country, and they did not win. The resistance is getting stronger and has spread deep into public opinion, in parts of Congress and, now, the Supreme Court. He is in rapid physical and mental decline, which is preventing him from understanding what he needs to do to save the midterms. And it is now too late. Regardless of anything they do, so long as we stay vigilant and active, they are blocked and doomed.


On SteveBrodner.substack.com

 Brothers and sisters…
We are living in an age where pain is not healed it is managed.
Where sorrow is not understood it is medicated.
Where the soul is not counseled it is chemically adjusted.
And Scripture warned us this day would come.
📖 1 Timothy 6:20
“O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:”
The Most High never told man to numb the spirit…
He told man to renew the mind.
Yet modern society does the opposite.
Instead of asking why the heart is heavy, they silence the signal.
💊 THE PARADOX OF THE “CURE”
Medical literature itself admits a disturbing reality:
A published review on antidepressant-induced suicidality reports that in some patients especially youth treatment can actually worsen depression and increase suicidal thoughts.
Read that again.
The medicine meant to stop despair…
Can intensify it.
That means the suffering person isn’t always deteriorating naturally sometimes the chemical intervention amplifies the darkness.
📖 Job 13:4
“But ye are forgers of lies, ye are all physicians of no value.”
This verse was never about banning healing…
It was a warning about misplaced trust.
When man replaces discernment with blind authority, healing becomes business.
🧪 NOT JUST PHARMACY — PHARMACEIA
The Greek word translated “sorceries” in Revelation is pharmakeia drug manipulation.
📖 Revelation 18:23
“…for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.”
Notice the connection:
Merchants → global influence → deception → pharmakeia
In ancient times sorcery altered perception
spiritually.
In modern times chemicals alter perception neurologically.
Different tools… same concept:
Control the mind → control the person.
🕊️ THE SPIRITUAL DIMENSION THEY IGNORE
Many people are not chemically broken
they are spiritually exhausted.
Grief
Isolation
Lack of purpose
Guilt
Fear
Loss of identity
These are conditions of the soul.
You cannot solve a meaning crisis with serotonin levels alone.
Medication may stabilize some yes
but society now uses it as the first answer instead of the last support.
And when the root is untouched, the darkness remains… sometimes stronger.
This isn’t an attack on individuals seeking help.
This is a warning against a system that:
• treats symptoms faster than causes
• profits from permanence of illness
• replaces shepherds with prescriptions
Healing in Scripture involved restoration, community, repentance, purpose, and renewal of mind not just suppression of feeling.
Because numbness is not peace.
Peace comes from alignment… not sedation.
Stay watchful.

Power and hunger in the vanishing future.

...In the beginning, the reptiloids did not think of themselves as monsters.
They remembered warmth once.
Not the warmth of sunlight — they still basked beneath artificial lamps far below the crust — but the warmth that passed between living beings when one protected another. That kind of heat had gone extinct in them generations ago. Evolution, they called it. Efficiency. Cold blood kept the calculations clean.
Aboveground, the surface citizens still believed in seasons.
They planted gardens in thinning soil. They sent their children to schools built from debt and hope. They voted. They scrolled. They argued in glowing rectangles. They sensed something slipping — a draft through the bones of society — but whenever they tried to name it, the air filled with static.
The reptiloids were masters of noise.
Beneath the cities of glass and asphalt, they had built their own: insulated chambers carved into bedrock, threaded with fiber and gold. No windows. No sunlight. Only server heat and the quiet hum of circulation systems pumping filtered air and laundered currency. They called these places Continuity Vaults. The surface called them myths.
Accountability does not travel well underground.
The reptiloids fed differently than the old stories suggested. They did not stalk alleys with claws. They fed on trajectories.
A scholarship defunded. A clinic shuttered. A housing program dissolved into a consulting contract. A pension converted into “market exposure.”
They siphoned futures before they fully formed. The young were their richest harvest — not their bodies, but their probabilities. Every dream deferred was a nutrient. Every closed door, a calorie. They consumed potential the way forests consume carbon.
And they kept meticulous records.
The digital financial lattice — a planetary nervous system of ledgers and predictive engines — tracked the herd in real time. Purchases, movements, preferences, dissent levels. The reptiloids’ algorithms pulsed like a second sun beneath the crust, ranking citizens by utility and docility. Credit scores became behavior scores. Behavior scores became access permissions.
It was never framed as control.
It was framed as optimization.
On the surface, people felt the tightening but could not find the rope. Prices rose without visible hands. Opportunities evaporated into fine print. Entire neighborhoods hollowed out like molted skin. The news cycle spun faster, louder, hotter — scandal layered upon outrage layered upon distraction — until the population mistook dizziness for democracy.
When someone shouted, “Where did the trillions go?” the noise surged.
Markets fluctuated. Experts debated. Influencers performed. And beneath it all, capital migrated downward like groundwater through limestone — vanishing into the insulated dark.
The reptiloids had engineered a system that rewarded cold blood. Empathy was inefficient; extraction was scalable. Those who adapted thrived. Those who hesitated were outcompeted. Soon, even some surface dwellers began to molt in spirit, shedding softness for survival.
That was the most elegant part of the design.
The species was no longer strictly biological. It was procedural.
To rise within the system, one had to learn to suppress warmth. To see children not as inheritors but as cost centers. To treat ecosystems as inventory. To convert crisis into acquisition. Those who mastered this transformation were welcomed — not underground, perhaps, but into boardrooms that mirrored the reptiloid cities in everything but depth.
The missing trillions were not misplaced.
They were the price of insulation.
Each vanished dollar thickened the walls between consequence and decision. Each diverted resource reinforced the subterranean architecture of power. The chambers below grew brighter, more climate-controlled, more permanent.
Aboveground, winters felt longer.
Parents worked three shifts and still lost ground. Teachers bought their own supplies. Young people learned to scale back their dreams before the world could do it for them. A generation raised on abundance inherited austerity and was told it was maturity.
Still, something stirred.
Warmth is stubborn.
It flares in kitchens where neighbors share food when the grid fails. It sparks in classrooms where overworked teachers refuse to give up on a single student. It spreads in whispers: This isn’t accidental. This is designed.
The reptiloids monitored the data and detected anomalies — small clusters of mutual aid, debt strikes, cooperative ventures, encrypted conversations that did not route cleanly through their predictive nets. The algorithms flagged them as inefficiencies.
But inefficiencies can compound.
For the first time in centuries, a few reptiloids experienced an unfamiliar sensation as they reviewed the models. A flicker. A discomfort in the chest cavity. Not fear exactly — more like a phantom warmth pressing against cold scales.
They had optimized everything except one variable:
What happens when the surface remembers that the young are not fuel?
If the citizens above ever reconnect the missing trillions to the missing futures — if they trace the tunnels of capital back to their insulated chambers — the underground cities will no longer protect their architects. Stone does not stop consequences forever.
The reptiloids built their empire in the dark to avoid the heat.
They forgot that warmth, once rekindled, spreads.
Absolutely — I can pull together real, verifiable sources about the actual “missing trillions” claims, Catherine Austin Fitts, HUD/DoD accounting discrepancies, and the broader context.
Below is a clean, APA‑formatted bibliography with active links, grounded in the search results you triggered.
These sources do not support any conspiracy, but they do document:
- the $21 trillion accounting‑adjustment controversy
- Catherine Austin Fitts’ public claims
- Inspector General reports
- academic and journalistic analysis
Everything below is real, citable, and link‑verified.
1. Fitts’ own documentation of the “missing money”
Fitts, C. A. (n.d.). The Missing Money. The Solari Report.
2. Article summarizing Fitts’ claims about DoD & HUD accounting issues
The Long Version. (2025, February 12). DOGE, the Pentagon, HUD, and the missing trillion$. Paperblog.
3. News coverage of Fitts’ claim that $21 trillion funded secret underground cities
MSN News. (2023). $21 trillion missing? Ex‑White House official claims it funded secret underground cities.
4. Summary of Fitts’ interview discussing the $21 trillion figure
Honadle, G. (2025). How $21 trillion went missing from U.S. taxpayers! — Catherine Austin Fitts full interview. Substack.
5. Investigative report on DoD & HUD “unsupported adjustments” totaling $21 trillion
Syrmopoulos, J. (2017, December 12). Shock report reveals Pentagon & HUD “lost” $21 trillion — Enough to pay back national debt. Roundtable / The Free Thought Project.
6. Psychoanalytic study of reptilian conspiracy belief formation
Dixon, A. M. (2023). The role of early trauma in the formation of belief in reptilian conspiracy theories: A psychoanalytic perspective. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 39(4), 663–681.
7. Cultural overview of reptilian myths
Alienated Media. (n.d.). The existence and influence of reptilians: Separating fact from fiction.
8. Symbolic meaning of “reptiloids” in sci‑fi and culture
Boutin, W. (2025). What is the deeper meaning of “Reptiloid”? SciFi Dimensions.