This is outrageous… another blatant move to handcuff America and force us into endless blind loyalty to Israel no matter what.
The Senate just pushed through Section 622 in their FY2027 Intelligence Authorization Act. It basically says the President can't even scale back or limit intelligence sharing with Israel without jumping through hoops… citing some specific national security reason and notifying congressional committees in just 15 days.
They're acting like Israel is untouchable. This bill expands sharing on Iran threats missiles and cyber issues but locks in the flow of our sensitive intel like it's a one way street with no off-ramp. Why does Israel get this special shield while American interests get sidelined?
For decades, we've poured billions in aid weapons and top secret data their way. US tax dollars fund their military operations… their settlements… and their endless conflicts. Yet any hint of holding them accountable or putting America first gets blocked by these procedural traps. This isn't partnership… its subordination.
Look at the reality on the ground. Gaza remains in ruins with civilian casualties mounting daily. Reports of aid blockades and disproportionate responses keep coming out, yet US government is busy passing laws that make it harder to even pause the blank check.
Where is the oversight for that? Where is the debate about whether this alliance is costing us credibility across the Arab world and beyond?
This provision sailed through the Senate Intelligence Committee on a 14 3 vote. Bipartisan they call it… but it really shows how locked in both parties are to the same lobby driven agenda.
Senator Tom Cotton and others are framing it as protecting shared threats but let's be honest… it's about ensuring Israel keeps getting our best intel even if their actions drag us into bigger regional messes.
If you appreciate our posts, it would mean the world if you followed our page. Thank you for being here.
Starmer’s UK bans Israel critics — because the "Labour" government is actually a Zionist front
After banning commentators Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur from entering the UK simply for criticizing Israel, the dark reality behind Keir Starmer’s regime has been fully exposed.
Piker said he “would never have imagined that a [Labour] government would ban me from entering the UK.”
But Drop Site News argues this is not really the old Labour Party — it is the product of Labour Together, a secretive project backed by illegally undeclared donor money, built to crush the left wing, weaponize antisemitism claims and enforce a ruthless pro-Israel agenda.
“Piker and Uygur were not banned by the Labour Party—they were banned by the Labour Together party,” the report says.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who enacted the ban, and MP David Taylor, who loudly demanded it, are both products of this exact shadow network.
The architect of this project is Morgan McSweeney, Starmer’s former chief of staff and the man widely seen as the real force running the UK. McSweeney only resigned in February after being caught pushing Peter Mandelsohn — a man with ties to Jeffrey Epstein — as the UK’s ambassador to the US. And when journalists tried to expose the network? Labour Together smeared them as Russian patsies and reported them to UK security bodies. (The Guardian confirmed in 2026 the smear was totally false).
Starmer’s government isn't serving the British people. It’s serving a secret, pro-Israel network that hijacked a political party, smears independent journalists, and bans anyone who dares to criticize the Zionist regime.
- @geopolitics_prime
Saturday, June 6, 2026
What You Should Know About Russ Vought, Trump’s Shadow President
Vought is the architect of Trump’s broader plan to fire civil servants,
freeze government programs and dismantle entire agencies. Here are some
key things to know about the D.C. insider who wants to take a hatchet
to the federal government.
On the second day of the federal government shutdown, President
Donald Trump shared an AI-generated video set to the classic song
“(Don’t Fear) The Reaper” by Blue Öyster Cult. The star of that video,
which quickly went viral, was Russell Vought, the president’s top budget
adviser. More than that, Vought is the architect of Trump’s broader
plan to fire civil servants, freeze government programs and dismantle
entire agencies, and he’s a big reason the second Trump administration
has been more effective at accomplishing its goals than the first. In
the video shared by Trump, Vought appeared as the scythe-wielding Grim
Reaper of Washington, D.C.
Vought’s title is director of the Office of Management and Budget.
The OMB directorship is one of the most powerful jobs in Washington, and
Vought has used his position to wage a quiet war to change the shape of
the entire U.S. government. In Vought’s hands, OMB has acted as a choke
point for the funding that Congress approves and agencies rely on to
run the government. While he tends to operate behind the scenes as much
as possible, his influence in Trump’s second administration is so
pronounced that people have described him as akin to a shadow president.
Here are some of the key things you should know about Vought. Read ProPublica’s full investigation here.
(Vought declined to be interviewed for the article. A spokesperson for
him at OMB would not comment on the record in response to a detailed
list of questions.)
1. Vought went from the mail room to becoming the chief antagonist of his own party.
A native of Trumbull, Connecticut, and the son of an electrician
father and a mother who spent decades in public education before helping
to launch a Christian school, Vought got his first job in D.C. politics
working in the mail room for Republican Sen. Phil Gramm of Texas, a
fierce budget hawk known for criticizing members of his own party for
breaking what he viewed as core conservative principles.
As Vought rose through the GOP ranks, eventually going on to advise
then-Rep. Mike Pence, he grew disillusioned with members of his party
who claimed to care about balanced budgets and spending cuts yet voted
to approve bills loaded with pork-barrel spending and corporate
giveaways.
In 2010, he quit Congress and helped launch an offshoot of the
Heritage Foundation think tank called Heritage Action for America, which
was tasked with strong-arming congressional Republicans to act more
conservatively.
“I think he thought the Republican leadership was a bigger impediment
to conservative causes than Democrats were,” a former Capitol Hill
colleague of Vought’s said.
2. OMB’s massive power supercharges Vought’s influence.
While the Office of Management and Budget is part of the White House,
Vought is a member of Trump’s cabinet along with the secretary of
defense and attorney general. OMB director has little of the cachet of
those jobs, but it plays a vital role. Every penny appropriated by
Congress first passes through the OMB. It also reviews all significant
regulations proposed by federal agencies, vets executive orders before
the president signs them and issues workplace policies for more than 2
million federal employees.
“Every goddam thing in the executive branch goes through OMB,”
explained Sam Bagenstos, a former OMB official during the Biden
administration.
3. Vought’s early work at OMB helped lead to Trump’s first impeachment.
This isn’t Vought’s first stint as OMB director; he held the same position during the first Trump administration.
In 2019, after the Trump White House pressured Ukraine’s government
to investigate then-candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter, it asked
Vought, then acting director, to freeze $214 million in congressionally
approved security assistance for Ukraine. He obliged.
This impoundment, later deemed illegal by the Government
Accountability Office, would trigger congressional investigations and,
ultimately, Trump’s first impeachment. During that process, Vought
refused to cooperate with investigators, calling the probe a “sham
process that is designed to relitigate the last election.”
After the attempt to freeze the Ukraine funds ultimately failed,
Vought and Mark Paoletta, an attorney and close ally of Vought’s, spent
the years between Trump’s presidencies developing a legal argument that
not only are such impoundments legal, but there is a long history of
presidents using the power. (Legal experts have disputed Vought’s
version of that history.)
4. Vought played a surprising role in popularizing the phrase “woke and weaponized.”
In 2021, Vought launched the Center for Renewing America, a think
tank devoted to keeping the MAGA movement alive and preparing for a
second Trump presidency. According to previously unreported recordings
obtained by ProPublica, Vought accepted an assignment from Trump to come
up with a way for conservatives to counter Black Lives Matter. He
popularized the concept of “woke and weaponized” government — a phrase
embraced by GOP politicians and activists to disparagingly label
policies, people and even agencies that didn’t fit with the MAGA agenda.
“If you’re watching television and the words ‘woke and weaponized’
come out of a politician’s mouth, you can know that this is coming …
from the strategies we’re putting out,” Vought boasted in a recording
obtained by ProPublica.
When Vought’s think tank released a federal budget blueprint in 2022,
calling for $9 trillion in cuts over 10 years, the word “woke” appeared
77 times across its 103 pages.
5. Vought’s vision for what would become Project 2025 began during Trump’s first term.
In 2017, while an adviser at OMB, Vought played a lead role in trying
to implement a Trump executive order that called for a top-to-bottom
reorganization of the federal government. A former OMB senior staffer
said Vought initially wanted to eliminate the U.S. Agency for
International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
and to fold the Department of Education and the Department of Housing
and Urban Development, along with food stamps programs, into a new
Department of Welfare. “They wanted to call it that because they think
it sounds bad,” a former OMB analyst said. “There were very few, if any,
debates where Russ wouldn’t take the most extreme option available to
him, the most conservative, the most budget-cutting.”
Trump’s Cabinet secretaries at the time resisted wholesale cuts, and
few of the plans reached fruition. But Vought’s suggestions now read
like a guide to the second Trump administration, which has gutted both
USAID and the CFPB and is hollowing out the Department of Education.
“I didn’t realize it then,” the former OMB staffer said, “but I was writing the first draft of Project 2025.”
6. Vought’s role shows Project 2025 has indeed shaped the administration.
Vought was a key figure in the work of Project 2025, the coalition of
conservative groups that created a roadmap and recruited future
appointees for the next Republican administration. He led Project 2025’s
transition portion, which included writing some 350 executive orders,
regulations and other plans to more fully empower the president. “I
don’t want President Trump having to lose a moment of time having fights
in the Oval Office about whether something is legal or doable or
moral,” Vought said in a private 2024 speech.
During the 2024 campaign, Trump repeatedly claimed to have nothing to
do with Project 2025. His campaign aides criticized the initiative, and
news reports suggested that Project 2025 leaders would be blacklisted
from working in the Trump White House.
But Vought deftly navigated the controversy, and Trump brought him
back to OMB.Meanwhile, the administration has moved quickly to fulfill
many of Project 2025’s policy objectives. Early on in this month’s
government shutdown, when Trump announced that he would soon meet with
Vought to decide which “Democrat Agencies” to temporarily or permanently
cut, he referred to his budget director as “Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame.”
7. Elon Musk and DOGE often acted at Vought’s direction, insiders say.
Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO and the world’s wealthiest person, may have
grabbed the headlines as his Department of Government Efficiency took a
chainsaw to budgets and staffing. But court records, interviews and
other accounts from people close to Vought show that DOGE’s efforts were
guided, more than previously known, by the OMB director.
“I can’t imagine that the DOGE team knew to target all these little
parts of the government without Russ pointing them there,” a former OMB
branch chief told ProPublica.
In May, an official with Citizens for Renewing America, a group
founded by Vought, credited Vought with steering DOGE’s cuts. “DOGE is
underneath the OMB,” the official said, according to a video of her
remarks. “Honestly, a lot of what Elon began pinpointing … was at the
direction of Russ.”
An administration official who has worked with Vought and Musk told
ProPublica that DOGE showed Vought that it was possible to ignore legal
challenges and take dramatic action. “He has the benefit of Elon
softening everyone up,” the official said. “Elon terrified the shit out
of people. He broke the status quo.”
8. Vought has used OMB to try to pressure Democrats into reaching a deal with Republicans to end the shutdown.
Vought has frozen $26 billion in federal funding for infrastructure
and clean energy projects in blue states in the days after the federal
government shut down on Oct. 1. The government has also followed through
on Vought’s earlier threat to fire a massive number of civil servants
if the shutdown were not averted.
“We work for the president of the United States,” a senior agency
official who regularly deals with the OMB told ProPublica. But right
now, he added, “it feels like we work for Russ Vought. He has
centralized decision-making power to an extent that he is the commander
in chief.”
GOLDMAN SACHS, JPMORGAN, AND THE IMF ALL ISSUED THE SAME WARNING AT THE SAME TIME: THE $6.7 TRILLION AI DATA CENTER BUBBLE IS ABOUT TO BURST — AND YOU WILL PAY FOR IT
You have read every article in this series. You know about the dry wells. The spiked electricity bills. The farmland destroyed. The communities deceived. The wildlife wiped out. The children damaged. The elderly widow who can’t pay her bill.
All of it — every single story — has been built on one assumption: that the AI data center boom is real. That the demand is real. That the $700 billion being spent this year will actually generate returns.
Now three of the most powerful financial institutions in the world — Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and the International Monetary Fund — are saying something that nobody in Big Tech wants you to hear:
It might all be a bubble. And when it bursts — just like the dot-com crash of 2000, just like the housing crash of 2008 — the people who will suffer most are not the billionaires who built it.
It will be you.
THE WARNING SIGNS THAT ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO IGNORE
Multiple major institutions — including Goldman Sachs, the IMF, and JPMorgan — issued simultaneous warnings about the AI bubble beginning in late 2025. The prevailing expert consensus among financial analysts is that the AI bubble is already showing major signs of strain — with smaller startups and pure-play AI companies at highest risk of collapsing first, while diversified tech giants may weather the downturn but face substantial write-downs and valuation drops. 
Goldman Sachs. JPMorgan. The IMF. All saying the same thing. At the same time. That is not a coincidence. That is a fire alarm.
All the classic signs of a speculative bubble are present and paying out simultaneously in the AI data center boom: steep valuations, overbuilt infrastructure, speculative investment, and artificially engineered growth. The industry has all the hallmarks of bubbles that have burst before — and left devastation in their wake.
Steep valuations. Overbuilt infrastructure. Speculative investment. Artificially engineered growth. That is the exact checklist that described the dot-com bubble in 1999 — one year before it collapsed and wiped out $5 trillion in wealth.
THE COMPANY AT THE CENTER OF THE BUBBLE — AND ITS TERRIFYING NUMBERS
CoreWeave — the AI data center company that went public in 2026 as the hottest IPO of the year — tells the story of the bubble perfectly. Despite explosive revenue growth from $16 million in 2022 to $1.9 billion in 2024, CoreWeave reported negative core earnings and was burning through cash at a rate that could only sustain operations for approximately 9 months as of its IPO filing. It carries $24.5 billion in total debt with $7.5 billion in interest payments due through the end of 2026. And most terrifyingly — 62% of CoreWeave’s revenue comes from a single customer: Microsoft. If Microsoft reduces its AI spending by even a fraction, CoreWeave collapses. 
$24.5 billion in debt. $7.5 billion in interest due this year. 62% of revenue from one company. Nine months of cash runway. This is the company that Wall Street valued at $23 billion at IPO. This is the company that represents the financial model of the AI data center boom.
According to Bloomberg, half of all proposed data centers in 2026 will face delays or cancellation — not because of community opposition, but because of financial reality. Components are not manufactured in the U.S. so contractors need to buy from Canada, Mexico, South Korea, and China — the very countries Trump’s tariffs have made more expensive. Interest rates on construction loans are eating up remaining cash. Corporations are scrambling for bond sales and bridge loans as timelines lag. Heavy users of AI tools are burning $500 to $2,000 per month each — costs that are proving unsustainable for most businesses.
$500 to $2,000 per month. Per user. For AI tools. Most businesses cannot sustain those costs. The moment businesses start cutting their AI subscriptions — the revenue that justifies $700 billion in data center construction disappears.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE BUBBLE BURSTS
Here is the scenario that financial analysts are now modeling — the scenario that Big Tech desperately hopes never makes headlines.
When the AI bubble bursts — and experts increasingly say it is a question of when, not if — many AI-focused data centers will face underutilization or become stranded assets. Some facilities will be powered down to cut costs. New or half-completed construction projects will be halted, leaving empty warehouses and unfinished infrastructure scattered across American farmland, wetlands, and communities. Operators of highly leveraged data centers will face financial stress, leading to auctions of hardware at deeply discounted prices.
Empty buildings. On land that used to be farms. Next to wells that used to provide water. In communities that gave away hundreds of millions in tax breaks. Surrounded by families whose electricity bills went up to power buildings that now sit empty.
That is what a data center bust looks like on the ground. And America has been promised it won’t happen. Just like they were promised in 1999. And in 2007.
The second major risk that could trigger the collapse is technological obsolescence arriving faster than anyone expected. The AI industry is transitioning from the compute-intensive model “training” phase — which requires enormous amounts of power and the biggest data centers — to a less demanding “inference” phase, where trained AI models simply execute their existing knowledge. Inference requires dramatically less power and completely different infrastructure. Data centers optimized for training workloads — the ones being built right now, on your farmland, with your water — could find themselves overbuilt and underutilized within just a few years.
The buildings being constructed right now — the ones draining your aquifer, hiking your electricity bill, destroying your community — may be obsolete before they are even finished. Because the technology they were designed to power is already evolving past them.
MICROSOFT IS ALREADY PULLING BACK — AND NOBODY IS REPORTING IT
Here is the most alarming data point in this entire story. The one that should make every American who has been paying higher electricity bills stop cold.
Microsoft — the single largest customer of CoreWeave, representing 62% of its revenue, and one of the companies that has committed hundreds of billions to data center construction — has begun canceling or pausing data center leases in multiple countries. Microsoft has also taken the extraordinary step of banning the use of AI by its own engineers — the very engineers building AI products — citing concerns about cost and productivity. Heavy users inside Microsoft were burning $500 to $2,000 per month on AI tools. The company decided that was unsustainable.
Microsoft. The company spending $80 billion this year on AI data centers. Is banning its own engineers from using AI. Because it costs too much.
Let that settle for a moment.
The company building the most data centers in human history has concluded that using the AI those data centers power costs more than it is worth. For its own employees.
And yet — your electricity bill is higher. Your water is being drained. Your farmland is being bulldozed. For buildings that Microsoft’s own engineers are being told not to use.
THE DOTCOM COMPARISON THAT KEEPS EXPERTS UP AT NIGHT
The late 2025 and early 2026 debate among the world’s most powerful financial minds has been described as “Doomsters vs Boosters” — with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang arguing the fundamentals are strong, while Goldman Sachs, the IMF, and a growing chorus of independent analysts point to the unmistakable signs of speculative excess. Google CEO Sundar Pichai acknowledged “there would be overshoots in terms of valuations” — but insisted demand is real. The critical question is: how big is the overshoot?
In 1999, everyone said dotcom demand was real. It was. But the overshoot — the overbuilding, the overvaluing, the overconfidence — was catastrophic. When it corrected, $5 trillion in wealth evaporated. Millions lost jobs. Pension funds were destroyed. Communities that had been promised tech prosperity were left with empty office parks.
The data center industry as a whole is unlikely to fully collapse — because general demand for cloud computing, video streaming, gaming, and enterprise IT remains strong. But AI-specific data centers — the ones built for the most power-hungry, most expensive, most rapidly evolving workloads — face the highest risk. And those are the ones being built right now. On your farmland. With your water. With your tax breaks. With your electricity.
The safest data centers will survive. The AI-specific mega-campuses — the ones that required the most sacrifice from American communities — face the highest risk of becoming tomorrow’s empty warehouses.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Every community in this series gave something.
Patsy Bode gave her home of 20 years in Indiana. The families of Festus gave their political trust — and then took it back. The 81-year-old widow in Virginia gave money she didn’t have. The farmers of Arizona gave their crops. The residents of New Carlisle gave their well water. The people of Utah gave their fight — and won.
All of them were told: this sacrifice is necessary. This is the future. This will create jobs and growth and American competitiveness.
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and the IMF are now warning: the financial model behind all of those sacrifices may be built on sand. The bubble may be inflating. The bust may be coming. And when it does — the empty buildings and the stranded assets will be left behind in communities that gave everything.
While the billionaires who built it will have already cashed out.
We have seen this movie before. In 2000. In 2008. The names were different. The buildings were different. The promises were the same.
Share this with everyone who has been paying higher electricity bills for data centers. They deserve to know the whole story — including the ending that Wall Street is quietly preparing for.
Follow for more data center updates
Source: Built In — “Where AI Data Centers Are Headed After 2025’s Boom” (January 14, 2026) + Goldman Sachs / IMF warnings compiled by Global Research (May 2026)
See less
And we thought it was JUST Section 224 of the 2027 NDAA that would combine the U.S. military and the IDF. Turns out there's several bills attempting to do the same. Anyone who still thinks these data centers are about silly videos and Chat GPT needs to wake up NOW.
A Whole-of-Government entrenchment of Israeli influence is advancing through coordinated legislation that subordinates U.S. intelligence, defense, and foreign policy priorities to Tel Aviv’s agenda, at the expense of American sovereignty, interests and taxpayers.
H. Res. 1339 endorses Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu’s plan to shift the relationship from U.S. aid to “mutual” defense cooperation and joint investment, praising joint operations against Iran while pushing deeper entanglement.
The U.S.-Israel FUTURES Act (H.R. 7540 / S. 3855) formalizes this initiative with $150 million authorized, creating frameworks for joint ventures, co-production, and rapid fielding of Israeli tech into the U.S. military.
The U.S.-Israel Defense Partnership Act (H.R. 1229 / S. 554) mandates a Defense Innovation Unit office in Israel, cooperative counter-unmanned systems programs, RDT&E on emerging technologies like AI and robotics, and efforts to fold Israel into the U.S. national technology and industrial base (NTIB) alongside allies like the UK and Australia.
Section 622 of the Senate’s FY27 Intelligence Authorization “enhances U.S.-Israel intelligence sharing” by further embedding a foreign power into America’s most sensitive national security apparatus and makes it nearly impossible to disentangle U.S. intelligence from Israel
See less
NEWLY RELEASED: FBI Records Released By Judicial Watch Show Butler Deputy Had Email Contact With Thomas Crooks Before Trump Rally Shooting. The Butler Story Just Got Stranger......
Butler County Sheriff’s deputy exchanged emails with Thomas Crooks before the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt against Donald Trump, according to documents obtained by the conservative Judicial Watch through a FOIA lawsuit.
A heavily redacted July 17, 2024, FBI electronic communication summarized interviews with five Butler County Sheriff’s Office deputies conducted July 16, 2024. In one summary, a deputy said she checked her emails after being contacted by a New York Times reporter and found two email communications from Crooks. The specific subject of the emails was redacted.
The newly released FBI records show the deputy told investigators she had two email communications with Crooks prior to the shooting. However, the FBI heavily redacted the records, leaving the subject of the emails and the nature of the interaction hidden from public view.
The watchdog group said it obtained 48 heavily redacted pages from the FBI that include interview summaries and investigative communications tied to Crooks and the Butler rally shooting. The records also state that after Crooks was killed, a SWAT officer found a gray remote device with numerical buttons, an antenna and a cellphone in Crooks’ pocket.
Judicial Watch filed its lawsuit in July 2025 after the FBI did not respond to a July 2024 FOIA request seeking records related to Crooks and the assassination attempt. The request sought investigative files, interview summaries, reports, communications, media, database records and any FBI communications involving personnel, sources, contractors or assets and Crooks himself. The case is titled Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice.
