NOTICE OF LIABILITY

To: All Sheriff and Police Departments, Government Agencies, and Public Officials

In: All 50 States of the United States

Date: [Insert Today’s Date]

Subject: Legal Liability for Neglecting to Prevent Harmful Deployment of 5G Technology and RF/EMF Infrastructure

NOTICE

We, the undersigned community members, hereby issue this formal Notice of Liability to all public officials, law enforcement agencies, and individuals entrusted with protecting public safety. This notice applies specifically to your failure to investigate, prevent, or act upon mounting evidence of potential harm caused by the deployment of 5G infrastructure and associated technologies.

This notice conveys our concern over the enduring threats to public health, safety, and rights, as supported by scientific, medical, and expert opinions, and obligates you to take immediate corrective action.

By this notice, you are warned and made liable should you continue to neglect your duty to prevent harm and protect the public.

NOTICE OF HARMS AND CONCERNS

1. Public Health Risks

Decades of research, including reports published by the Naval Medical Research Institute and independent scientists, indicate biological and environmental risks at electromagnetic radiation (EMF/RF) exposure levels far below current regulatory limits. Evidence rejects the claim that non-thermal exposure lacks biological effects, encompassing risks for:

Increased cancer rates, particularly in children and vulnerable groups.

Genetic damage through DNA disruption or radiofrequency-linked genetic manipulation.

Neurological damage, fertility decline, and immune system suppression.

Emerging theories involving torsion fields complicate the picture further, suggesting that 5G infrastructure intensifies civilizational diseases by permanently embedding disruptive radiation into the environment.

2. Environmental Contamination

Microwave and torsion field emissions accumulate in the Earth's crust, creating long-lasting "phantom fields" that no current technology can eliminate. Their presence is theorized to harm ecosystems, altering soil quality and contributing to biodiversity loss.

3. Surveillance State and Weaponization

The 5G network facilitates mass surveillance, tracking individuals within 10 cm precision, utilizing face recognition and GPS. Furthermore, claims suggest 5G can be weaponized, allowing remote transmission of biological payloads, genetic manipulation, or targeted attacks against individuals under the guise of technological progress.

4. Lack of Oversight and Transparency

Regulators, engineers, and telecommunications corporations continue deploying wireless infrastructure beside sensitive areas such as homes, schools, and hospitals without resolving long-standing scientific disputes or conducting up-to-date safety studies. This is a breach of public trust and duty.

The deiberate or negligent failure by corporations, government agencies, or private entities to ensure transparency, protection, and accountability concerning actions or activities resulting in severe environmental harm or harm to living beings constitutes gross violation of ethical and legal responsibilities. The following fees and penalties apply to any entity or individual participating in or allowing such harm to occur. Fees are strictly enforceable, non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, and subject to treble damages for repeated or egregious non-compliance.

Fees and Penalties for Neglect of Oversight and Harm to the Environment

Concealment or Non-Disclosure of Environmental Impacts:

Failure to disclose environmental testing, use of harmful technologies, or deliberate contamination:

$10,000,000,000 per violation/event.

Failure to Conduct Independent Environmental Assessments:

Proceeding with environmentally harmful operations without an independent safety assessment or reviewing full environmental implications:

$5,000,000,000 per project.

Neglect of Duty to Protect the Public from Environmental Harm:

Intentional negligence in regulating or enforcing policies to protect health, ecosystems, and natural resources:

$10,000,000 per day of non-compliance.

Lack of Transparency in Deployment of Harmful Technologies (e.g., 5G, RF/MW infrastructure, Geoengineering):

Non-disclosure of systems contributing to long-term contamination or harm to ecosystems and public health:

$15,000,000 per affected jurisdiction or project.

Suppression of Whistleblowers, Experts, or Scientific Data Related to Harmful Practices:

Interference with, suppression of, or censorship of transparency efforts to expose environmental or health risks:

$25,000,000 per incident/person silenced.

Fees and Penalties for Specific Environmental Harm

Toxic Pollution and Contamination of Natural Resources:

Release of harmful substances into air, water, or soil, including heavy metals, chemical agents, or radioactive materials:

$10,000,000,000 per release/event.

Radiation and Electromagnetic Contamination (e.g., harmful torsion fields, RF/Microwave emissions):

Use of microwave, electromagnetic, or torsion field emissions that cause permanent contamination of land and health crises for living organisms:

$10,000,000,000 per project/affected area.

Geoengineering and Weather Manipulation (e.g., HAARP, Chemtrails, Cloud Seeding):

Introduction of aerosols, nanotechnology, or harmful substances into the atmosphere or weather systems without public consent or oversight:

$10,000,000,000 per incident/project.

Destruction of Habitats or Ecological Systems:

Damage to sensitive ecosystems, forests, marine environments, or agricultural resources impacting biodiversity and human food supply:

$5,000,000,000 per affected region.

Weaponization of Environmental Technologies:

Use of energy waves, atmospheric manipulation, or nanotechnology for spurious purposes leading to physical or ecological harm:

$15,000,000,000 per deployment/action.

Egregious Negligence and Non-Compliance Penalties

Continued Failure to Cease Harmful Activities After Notice:

Any attempts to persist after receiving formal notice of harm or required compliance with protective guidelines:

$20,000,000,000 per month of unresolved harm.

Complicity in Large-Scale Environmental Catastrophe:

Negligence or actions leading to irreversible harm, pandemics, widespread illness, or collapses in biodiversity:

$50,000,000,000 per catastrophic event.

Intentional Non-Disclosure of Testing, Data, or Policies:

Deliberately withholding known risks and data regarding harmful environmental practices from public scrutiny or oversight:

$25,000,000,000 per instance of suppressed information.

Accountability Statement

The failure of corporations, governments, or other entities to ensure transparency and accountability contributes to escalating harm to ecosystems and human health. Be it through negligence, concealment, or intentional violation, the assessed fees are meant to reflect the catastrophic impact of such decisions on society and the planet.

All violations will result in fees enforceable through a universal commercial lien on responsible assets or property, and are subject to interest accruing at 15% monthly until paid. Treble damages are automatically applied to actions showing willful refusal to comply with these terms.

By failing in your duty to protect public and environmental safety, you assume full liability for all damages outlined herein.

DEMANDS AND OBLIGATIONS

By signing and issuing this notice, we demand the following immediate actions to protect the public:

Immediate Suspension of 5G Deployment

All 5G rollouts should be suspended until independent investigations establish safety beyond reasonable doubt. This includes halting installation of towers and small-cell transmitters in neighborhoods, near schools, or any other sensitive areas.

Comprehensive Health Investigations and Public Accountability

Commission independent, peer-reviewed studies incorporating both biological effects of EMF/RF and the potential impact of torsion fields on human health and the environment.

Make all scientific findings available to the public without redaction or suppression.

Implementation of a Protective Moratorium

Until these issues are resolved, we demand a moratorium on wireless infrastructure placement within reasonable proximity to residential neighborhoods, schools, hospitals, and other public spaces.

Support Safer Alternatives

Encourage development and transition to safer communication methods, such as LiFi systems or low-frequency alternatives that reduce health and environmental risks.

NOTICE OF LIABILITY AND DUTY OF CARE

As public officials, law enforcement agents, and trusted servants of the community, you are legally, ethically, and morally obligated to:

Investigate all credible claims of harm posed by 5G technology and RF exposure.

Take actions to protect public health, the environment, and constitutional rights of the population.

Refuse complicity in the rollout or continuation of systems known or suspected to pose dangers.

Failure to fulfill these obligations constitutes gross negligence and dereliction of duty, making you individually and collectively liable for any harm caused to the public. If you continue to ignore these warnings, you may face:

Legal Proceedings: Civil or criminal lawsuits filed by individuals, families, or advocacy groups for health damages, environmental harm, or breaches of constitutional protections.

Public Outrage: Damage to your reputations and careers stemming from complicity in avoidable harm.

Human Rights Violations: Consequences under domestic and international law for exposing citizens to untested, potentially harmful technologies.

CONCLUSION AND FINAL WARNING

This notice places you in a position of responsibility and liability. Any harm resulting from 5G deployment, whether through its health effects, environmental contamination, or surveillance misuse, will be interpreted as willful neglect. You are advised to act immediately, as inaction will no longer excuse your liability.

If there is no danger, *an independent and transparent investigation should be welcomed by all parties. If an investigation is avoided or suppressed, public doubt will escalate — and your failure to act could lead to severe consequences.

WE WILL HOLD YOU ACCOUNTABLE. PUBLIC SAFETY IS NON-NEGOTIABLE.

Respectfully,

[Your Name/Organization]

[Autograph]

[Contact Information]

[Community Members, Advocates, or Relevant Organizations That Support This Notice of Liability]

See less

A Look at The Many State Felonies Elon Musk Seemingly Committed to Elect Trump

What he said in public. What his lawyers said under oath. What the law in four states calls it.

Written by: Christopher Armitage

In the closing weeks of the 2024 election, Musk spent roughly $290 million on Trump’s behalf, a figure documented in Federal Election Commission filings. About a quarter billion of that went through America PAC, the super PAC he founded in May 2024. Another $20.5 million ran through a vehicle called RBG PAC, funded by his revocable trust and structured to hide his connection until after the votes were counted. More than $50 million of the America PAC money paid for a giveaway program: a million dollars a day to one signer of an online petition, with the petition restricted to registered voters in seven swing states. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina. No other states eligible. More than a million people signed. The first three winners came from Pennsylvania in the days leading up to its October 21 voter registration deadline. Musk personally announced the winners at public events, holding cardboard checks the size of a person.

He told the public, in his own words, that the selection was random.

On October 5, 2024, at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, Musk told the crowd: “President Trump must win to preserve the Constitution. He must win to preserve democracy in America.” Two weeks later, on October 19, at a Harrisburg town hall with Trump’s campaign, he announced the giveaway program: “We’re going to be awarding a million dollars randomly to people who have signed the petition every day from now until the election.” That same day, he posted on X to his then-200 million followers that the prize would be “randomly” awarded. The next day, October 20, he posted again that signers had “a daily chance of winning $1M!”

Random. Daily chance. Sweepstakes language. The kind of language that, if accurate, describes a lottery.

Sixteen days after Musk first used the word “randomly,” his lawyers told a Pennsylvania state court, under oath, the opposite.

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner had filed against Musk and America PAC on October 28, 2024, seven days before the election, in Krasner v. Musk, case number 241003509 in Philadelphia’s main trial court. The civil filing was the move available on that timeline. Criminal charges require grand jury work that cannot happen in a week. What was not available in those seven days has been available in the eighteen months since.

The Many State Felonies Elon Committed to Elect Trump.

What he said in public. What his lawyers said under oath. What the law in four states calls it.

The hearing was on November 4, 2024, the day before the election. Judge Angelo Foglietta presided. The PAC put two witnesses on the stand. Christopher Gober, the PAC’s lawyer and former treasurer, and Christopher Young, its executive director and current treasurer.

Gober’s words on the record: “There is no prize to be won. The $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance. We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow.”

Young testified that he personally vetted the recipients ahead of time, that the petition functioned “like a job application,” and that signers were screened for political alignment with the PAC’s mission before they could be selected. He confirmed that recipients signed nondisclosure agreements about how they were actually chosen. Asked about Musk’s use of the word “randomly,” Young conceded that it was “not the word I would have selected.” The judge denied Krasner’s preliminary injunction the same day on narrow Pennsylvania-lottery-law grounds, finding that because the recipients were preselected, the giveaway technically did not meet the legal definition of an illegal lottery.

The civil filing produced the evidentiary record any future prosecutor inherits. Gober’s admission, on the record, that the recipients of more than $50 million in payments were preselected, while Musk was simultaneously telling 200 million people the recipients were random. That record has been on Krasner’s own docket for eighteen months. The criminal investigation he announced remains open. No charges have been filed. A person without Musk’s resources who paid even a single voter twenty dollars to vote a particular way could be charged under 25 P.S. § 3539, Pennsylvania’s vote-buying statute, and would face up to seven years in prison. A person caught selling drugs on a Philadelphia street corner with less evidentiary documentation than what is on the Krasner v. Musk docket would be in the back of a squad car the same day. The asymmetry is not about the strength of the case. It is about the identity of the defendant.

That brings us to the law.

Read more: https://cmarmitage.substack.com/.../a-look-at-the-many...

 

 A troubling pattern has emerged in American law enforcement: surveillance technology tested in the Gaza conflict is now being deployed across U.S. cities.

Skydio, a California-based drone manufacturer, shipped over 100 AI-powered reconnaissance drones to the Israeli Defense Forces following October 2023. These drones have now become the foundation of a massive domestic surveillance expansion across the United States.

The company has secured contracts with over 800 law enforcement and security agencies nationwide, expanding from just 320 agencies less than a year prior. Police departments in major cities including New York, Boston, Chicago, Philadelphia, San Diego, Cleveland, and Jacksonville have all adopted Skydio drone systems. Federal agencies including Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection have also acquired these units.

The New York Police Department operates 41 Skydio drones and deployed them over 20,000 times in less than a year. These drones automatically upload images to Axon Evidence, a digital database system, creating permanent records of civilian activities, protest movements, and public gatherings.

Skydio maintains an office in Israel and partners with DefenseSync, a military contractor serving the Israeli Defense Forces. The company has raised hundreds of millions from Israeli-American venture capital firms with extensive ties to Israel's technology and military sectors.

What was tested on Palestinian civilians is now being refined on American protesters, creating a feedback loop where surveillance capabilities developed abroad become infrastructure for domestic monitoring.

Source: The Grayzone. (2025). AI drones used in Gaza now surveilling American cities. November 2.

#Surveillance #Drones #CivilLiberties #Police #Technology