Sunday, May 10, 2026
TRUMP SAYS TO AMERICAN CITIZENS:
"WE WILL FIND YOU AND WE WILL KILL YOU."
Not: "We will find unlawful people and bring them to Justice."
Because he is not TALKING about "UNLAWFUL PEOPLE".
He is talking AMERICAN CITIZENS who exercise their Constitutionally guaranteed FREE SPEECH supporting any cause, party, right, or HUMAN BEING he hates. Who he thinks he can BAN.
Oh, not by Royal Decree. Trump is no king. He is STILL nothing but that wanna-be-mafia kid from Queens, whose father sent to boot camp to try to make a man. A serial failure in business and relationships. A piece of reality show puff pastry in makeup and heels who strut around stages all day pretending to be tough.
HOW CHILDISH. HOW HUMILIATING. Ending an official Presidential memo for a report on National Counterterrorism with a line from a Hollywood MOVIE. As if it is something he came up with HIMSELF.
A movie, by the way, about an international ring of criminals that traffic young girls to rich elite perverts. Gee. Seems like that topic is ALWAYS on his mind.
Who is America's Enemy Number One? All Trump has to do is look in that damned mirror he loves so much. HE is the one who is hurting Americans the MOST.
A Federal Judge Rules the Discriminatory Truth Behind DOGE’s Grant Cuts
Over a year after DOGE’s mass firings and grant terminations rocked the country, one federal judge has issued a blistering ruling.
By Phenix S Halley, May 8, 2026
Critics warned Donald Trump’s illegal Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was operating beyond the bounds of the law, slashing federal programs and carrying out sweeping firings across government agencies. Now, a federal judge just handed down a blistering ruling against the department, once run by Tesla CEO Elon Musk… And you’ll want to pay attention to this one.
It’s been over a year since DOGE began mass terminations, which resulted in hundreds of thousands of Americans– disproportionately Black women– without work. It’s now 2026, and the Black unemployment rate is still raising concerns from economists.
In addition to thousands of folks losing their jobs, DOGE was also responsible for the mass cancellation of thousands of Congress-approved grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), which U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon has officially ruled unlawful.
“There can be no serious dispute that the review process implemented by DOGE did not conform to, or even resemble, NEH’s ordinary grant-review process,” Judge McMahon wrote in an opinion Thursday (May 7). The decision marks a major setback for the administration’s cost-cutting campaign, stemming from Trump’s promise to cut federal spending and make the government more efficient.
Instead, however, DOGE unlawfully terminated more than 1,400 humanities grants worth over $100 million, the judge said. The grants previously funded projects involving scholars, museums, writers and cultural organizations across the country, Reuters reported. Now that the grants have been cut, Judge McMahon argued these actions violate both the First Amendment and parts of the Fifth Amendment.
What should be most concerning about the decision to people of color, McMahon also took issue with DOGE’s questionable review process, which she described as “blatant viewpoint discrimination.” We’ve been keeping you up to date with all of Trump’s anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which have targeted Black and other minorities at the federal level.
While the controversial DOGE review process is now facing judicial pressure, former employees at the government agency already testified to using DEI as keywords to determine which programs and offices get cut.
The Root previously told you about those depositions, which stemmed from a lawsuit brought against DOGE by the Modern Language Association (MLA), American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) and American Historical Association (AHA) in 2025.
During former DOGE staffer Nathan Cavanaugh‘s deposition, he admitted to being in charge of reviewing grants from the Biden administration, despite having no professional or academic experience in the field.
Another DOGE employee, Justin Fox, testified that he used artificial intelligence to determine whether grants related “at all” to diversity initiatives, even though he couldn’t provide a clear definition of DEI. Still, the rest of the DOGE staff took little– if any– responsibility for mass firings and glaring mistakes.
In the judge’s ruling, she rejected arguments that the responsibility rests solely on the AI system rather than government officials. McMahon warned officials could not avoid constitutional scrutiny by leaving it all up to ChatGPT. In the end, she called out Trump and DOGE for using their political pull to disregard the Constitution.
McMahon wrote that while a new administration can pursue lawful funding priorities, “it has no license to suppress disfavored ideas
Saturday, May 9, 2026
In 1972, a team of MIT researchers commissioned by the Club of Rome published "The Limits to Growth," using a computer model called World3 to simulate humanity's future on a finite planet.
The study examined five interconnected variables: population growth, industrial output, food production, nonrenewable resource depletion, and pollution.
Their "business as usual" scenario warned that unchecked exponential growth would lead to overshoot of Earth's carrying capacity, followed by a sharp decline in industrial capacity and population sometime in the mid-21st century, likely around 2040.
Recent analyses, including updates by Gaya Herrington in 2021 and recalibrations through 2023, show real-world data tracking this standard run closely. Resource extraction strains, environmental degradation, and economic pressures align with model predictions, indicating we remain on course for collapse unless systemic changes occur.
The report emphasized that technology alone cannot indefinitely overcome limits; deliberate shifts toward sustainability, reduced consumption, and equitable development are essential to stabilize society.
Without action, the coming decades risk cascading failures in supply chains, food systems, and social stability as growth reverses. This prescient work underscores the urgency of reimagining progress within planetary boundaries before tipping points become irreversible.
"Dear Justice Roberts,
"It has come to my attention through your various media appearances that your feelings are hurt — that people view you and your Court as political actors, which you insist is not an accurate understanding of what the Court does.
"So let me resolve the confusion: the misunderstanding is yours, not ours.
"People believe your Court is political because it is and acts so in plain view of the nation.
"You unleash unlimited corporate money into elections by inventing constitutional protections for concentrated wealth. You dismantle voting protections while dining with the very political movement that benefits from their destruction. You expand presidential immunity in ways conveniently favorable to a corrupt executive you have rewarded with extraordinary deference, 90% deference. And then you perform public astonishment when Americans recognize your pattern.
"Your Court did not merely 'interpret' the Constitution. It selectively hollowed it out whenever democratic participation threatened entrenched power.
"Citizens United accelerated America’s transformation into an oligarchy where billionaires and corporations wield more political influence than millions of citizens combined. Shelby County gutted the Voting Rights Act, after which states moved with remarkable speed to burden the very voters the Act was designed to protect. The immunity ruling signaled that sufficient power can place a president beyond meaningful accountability.
"Then you publicly mourn the collapse of trust. What exactly did you think would happen?
"Legitimacy is not something a court grants itself while issuing ideologically convenient outcomes wrapped in constitutional language — when the public is fortunate enough to even receive a full opinion instead of another consequential ruling buried in the shadow docket.
"Legitimacy is earned through restraint, consistency, ethical seriousness, and fidelity to principle even when principle is inconvenient to power.
"This is precisely the credibility your Court squandered. We understand perfectly well what we have been watching. We all see you and your court and its role in what our nation has become.
"And we are furious — not because we are too ignorant to understand constitutional law, but because we are capable of reading the Constitution you claim to defend- while watching this Court repeatedly twist it to serve its own ideological will.
"History will remember this era. And it will remember you and your Court- not as a guardian of constitutional democracy, but as a key institution that eroded it. That is already your legacy, so stop whining- you earned a nation's scorn."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









