BREAKING: Trump's racist goons pulled the Uruguay World Cup team off their bus and deployed SNIFFER DOGS in a deeply racist show of profiling!

The Trump administration’s cruel border obsession is turning the American World Cup matches into an international embarrassment. Upon arrival in the States, the Uruguay national team – twice World Cup winners – was pulled over on the side of the road for a humiliating canine search of their luggage before they even arrived at their hotel.

In another incident, Iraq striker Aymen Hussein was detained for nearly seven hours at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport, while a member of the Iraqi team’s photography staff was denied entry entirely.

Fans from across the world weren’t having it:

“Imagine training your whole life to represent your country at the World Cup, only to have your first touch in America be a sniffer dog checking your luggage on the roadside,” one post read.

Many pointed out the obviously racist pattern of teams from Latin America and Africa facing far more aggressive scrutiny than others. “What a coincidence that the fixation on registering and checking is always with American countries from Mexico southward or from Africa,” one blogger wrote.

Another referred to the United States as “A country that should never again host a World Cup. If you only like people from your own country, then don’t organize an event that should be open to the world.”

Oh snap, we were afraid something like this might happen. Stephen Miller and his horde of goons have no use for soccer, so let’s make a point, right?

They have already denied entry to fans, journalists, and soccer federation officials from Haiti, Iran, Senegal, and the Ivory Coast, all World Cup-qualifying nations that fall under the State Department’s 39-nation travel ban (the players and coaches got carve-outs).

They want to showcase Trump’s “America First” obsession to the whole world. They want to project to the MAGA masses that their hatred toward Black and brown people as well as Muslims are bigger than sports – watch us treat their elite athletes and symbols of their national pride like criminals. Aren’t we badasses?

Hosting the World Cup is a global honor, which provides a setting to celebrate global unity and amity through sports.

Instead, under Trump, that’s all discarded as woke. In its place is more of its petty cruelty and self-sabotage on the world stage.

"What has the United States become?" the more than five billion people watching across the world are asking themselves.

Think of people, say, crowding around a communal village TV in rural West Africa to get a snippet of the real America on the screen in addition to the football, and seeing and hearing about stuff like this.

What disappointment they must feel when they see America, which has always been the symbol and hope that a better life exists and awaits out there, now behaving like a bunch of merciless thugs.

Shameful. Embarrassing. Humiliating.

     (What? Trump is a Liar? 38, 000 thousand confirmed lies in one term. Who knew?)

WE ARE ENTITLED TO KNOW THE REAL STORY!!

Tucker Carlson dropped a bombshell Thursday, claiming that Dan Bongino — while still serving as FBI Deputy Director — admitted to him that Donald Trump himself ordered the investigation into the 2024 Butler assassination attempt to be SHUT DOWN!

 

Carlson said that after pressing Bongino about Thomas Crooks’ online presence, Bongino “became hysterical” on the phone. “He was clearly terrified,” Carlson said. After a long series of calls and texts, Bongino allegedly told him: “Take it up with Trump. He’s the one who shut down the investigation.” 

Carlson made the explosive claim during an appearance on Mario Nawfal’s podcast, stating flatly: “I know that Trump shut down the investigation into Butler. That is a fact. Dan Bongino told me that when he worked at the FBI.”

 

Let that sink in. The man who claimed the left was trying to assassinate him may have personally buried the investigation into his own near-murder.

 

Bongino fired back Friday, calling Carlson’s accusations “seriously one of the most delusional things” he’d ever heard, and sharing purported text messages to dispute the account. He also called Carlson a “nepo baby” on X.

 

So either Tucker Carlson is lying about a sitting FBI official confessing to a cover-up — or Dan Bongino is lying about what he told Tucker Carlson. Either way, two of the right wing’s most prominent voices are now accusing each other of being liars about the most serious domestic security incident in years.

 

The truth is in the texts, Tucker says. Release them.

See less

 

One man found $2 billion. The President of the United States destroyed him for it. And lost.

Ernest Fitzgerald. Air Force analyst. 1968. He found the Pentagon hiding a $2 billion overrun from Congress. He told the truth under oath. Nixon fired him personally. He lost his house. His wife went to work to feed the kids. He fought 13 years. He sued a sitting president. And the laws he forced into existence protect every federal whistleblower in America today.

Start in Birmingham, Alabama. 1926. Poor family. His dad made steel. Depression kid. Learned it young — tell the truth, work hard, don't cheat.

Navy in World War II. Fixed electronics. Came home. Engineering degree, University of Alabama, 1951. Learned exactly how the Pentagon spends money and how contractors bill it. Got dangerously good at it.

1965. The Air Force hires him. Age 39. Senior civilian. His whole job is finding waste.

1966. They put him on the C-5A Galaxy. Biggest military cargo plane ever built. Lockheed's contract. Around $3 billion. Ernest starts checking the numbers.

Something is wrong. The real costs are way higher than the contract. Not a little. Billions over. And the Pentagon is hiding it. From Congress. From everyone.

The overrun hits $2 billion. Massive in 1968. The Pentagon knew. Lockheed knew. Both lying to keep the program alive. Ernest saw the real books. He couldn't unsee them.

November 1968. He's scheduled to testify. His bosses get to him first. Don't mention the overruns. Say the program is fine. Protect the Air Force.

He had a choice. Lie and keep his career. Tell the truth and lose everything.

November 13, 1968. Under oath. He says it. The C-5A is $2 billion over. The Pentagon hid it. On the record. National news. The room goes silent — a Pentagon official just told Congress it had been lied to.

Then comes the part that should make your blood run cold.

January 1969. Nixon takes office. He sees Ernest's file. He takes it personally. He tells his chief of staff Haldeman: get rid of Fitzgerald. The White House tapes caught it. The President of the United States, on tape, ordering one honest analyst destroyed.

November 1969. Fired. They claimed budget cuts. Everyone knew the real reason. Nobody would say it.

Ernest had nothing. Three kids. A mortgage. No income. He lost the house. His wife Nell went to work. The savings were gone. The retirement was gone. Defense companies wouldn't touch him. Blacklisted everywhere. A marked man.

He didn't quit.

He filed. He said the firing was illegal revenge for testifying. He demanded his job back. He didn't know it would take 13 years.

1973. A commission ruled the firing was wrong. The Pentagon brought him back — to an empty desk. Following the rules. Still punishing him.

1974. Nixon resigned. Watergate. It didn't help Ernest. The same officials were still there. Still wanted him gone.

So he did something nobody had ever done. He sued the President. Personally. He said presidential revenge against a whistleblower violated the Constitution. One Alabama engineer. Against the entire United States government. Unlimited Pentagon lawyers on one side. His small legal team on the other.

The case climbed for years. District court. Appeals. More appeals. And in 1981, the Supreme Court took it.

June 24, 1982. Nixon v. Fitzgerald. 5–4. The Court ruled a president has immunity for official acts. Ernest could not collect a dollar from Nixon. On paper, he lost.

But read the opinion. It laid the whole thing bare. Nixon ordered the firing. The retaliation happened. Ernest was wronged. The Supreme Court of the United States said so, in writing, forever.

And the same day — the part that changed everything — the Court decided a second case. Harlow v. Fitzgerald. 8–1. It ruled that other federal officials do NOT get full immunity. They can be sued. That single ruling is the shield protecting federal whistleblowers right now, today.

Then the final turn. The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 — passed partly because of him — had built a new board. In 1982, that board ruled the firing illegal. Full reinstatement. Full back pay. Full benefits. Thirteen years after Nixon tried to erase him, Ernest Fitzgerald walked back into the Pentagon with real authority — and kept hunting waste until he retired. Never touched again. Protected by the laws he won.

Here's why this isn't history.

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 exists because of his fight. The Office of Special Counsel exists because of his fight. The Government Accountability Project exists because of his fight. Every single person who has ever exposed fraud inside the U.S. government and lived to keep their job is standing on Ernest Fitzgerald's shoulders.

The Pentagon still wastes billions. Lockheed became Lockheed Martin — the biggest defense contractor on Earth. The C-5A still flies. But the next time someone inside your government finds the truth and refuses to bury it, there's a law that says they get to survive.

One man, fired by a president, built that protection out of 13 years of his own ruin.

That's not a man who lost at the Supreme Court. That's a man who beat a president and never knew how to quit.

A sitting president ordered him erased, on tape, and almost got away with it.

Pass it on and you finish what they couldn't bury — the proof one honest man beat the most powerful office on earth.

#ErnestFitzgerald #Whistleblower #PentagonWaste #TruthWins

~Weird But True

See less

 

 

BREAKING: A shocking new Guardian investigation discovers that Trump and Hegseth murdered EIGHT CHILDREN and four adults, including a pregnant woman, in an airstrike on a school and homes in Somalia…and NEVER told the public!

What ELSE aren’t they telling us?

Shortly after 9am on 15 November 2025, the town of Jamaame in south Somalia was pummeled with a series of explosions. Missiles, almost certainly fired from American MQ-9 Reaper drones, destroyed a school and several homes.

“All my children were lying on the ground covered in blood. When I tried to tend to them, shells began falling everywhere. Every direction you turned, there were shells and missiles raining everywhere,” said Marian Haji Abdi Guled.

A farmer, Abdullahi Mohamed Abo Sheikh Ali, returned home in shock to find his children murdered. His grandfather recounted to the Guardian how “clothes and books were scattered on the ground, but I couldn’t focus on them. I was in shock, standing before the bodies of my grandchildren. They were ripped to pieces.”

Mohamed is tortured by the memory of having to find the pieces of his torn-apart grandchildren. They were too slippery, he says, and kept sliding from his grasp. “There was no place to grip because they were ripped to pieces.”

“The Americans bombed us,” said Abdullahi. “Children, women and elders were bombed. They spared nothing.”

The strike killed Abullahi's heavily pregnant daughter-in-law Safiyo Hassan Abukar, her ten-year-old daughter Abdifatah, seven-year-old Abdinasir, six-year-old Hussein, and four-year-old Abdurahman.

Mohamed Hassan Abdulle found his home flattened and the mangled bodies of his 26-year-old wife, Farhiyo Hassan Nuur, and daughter, 10-month-old Layla Mohamed Hassan.

He stood beside his destroyed home, the entire neighbourhood ablaze. “I couldn’t even find anyone to help carry the bodies of my wife and daughter,” he says.

Gedow Ibrahim received a call from his wife, terrified about the circling drones. He raced home. His daughters, Maryan, nine, and Farhiyo, seven, were dead.

“I saw the lifeless bodies of my children. One of them had their left arm torn off. The other one had shrapnel in their back, which came out of their chest.”

Mohamed says at least 18 homes were destroyed. The school was reduced to a shell. Guled counted nine strikes in the Burburka neighbourhood alone.

Locals say that the al-Shabaab terror group has no presence in the town, which raises huge questions about why and how this quiet village of livestock herders was selected to be massacred, why the presence of children playing in the street didn’t deter the strikes, or why they kept firing after the first homes were hit.

The Trump administration has refused to comment on anything. When the White House was approached for a response to the Jamaame strikes, the deputy press secretary Anna Kelly asked if the Guardian would also focus on “fraud committed by Somalis in the United States?”

Between these strikes in Somalia and the massacre of sailors in the Caribbean, it is clear that the Trump administration is simply killing for the sake of killing.

This is the consequence of building the world’s most sophisticated murder machine – the people in charge of pressing the buttons won’t always be responsible or empathetic.

Sometimes, they will be murderous, racist psychopaths like Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth.

They must be held accountable after all this is over. These crimes are beyond horrific.

 

In April 2025, a federal IT staffer filed a whistleblower report alleging that members of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency had caused a significant cybersecurity breach at the National Labor Relations Board. Within days, Musk posted about him publicly. The day after that, the whistleblower's brake line was cut. The story resurfaced this month after circulating widely across social media, prompting a fresh wave of public attention more than a year after the original incident.

Dan Berulis, an IT staffer at the NLRB, filed his report on April 14, 2025, alleging that DOGE officials had demanded unrestricted access to internal systems with “essentially unrestricted permission to read, copy, and alter data.” He added that within minutes of DOGE personnel creating user accounts, login attempts came from an IP address in Primorskiy Krai, Russia, using the correct usernames and passwords. He noted that many of these attempts came within 15 minutes of engineers opening their accounts.

The attempts failed only because of the NLRB's no-out-of-country login policy. Berulis also told NPR that raising concerns internally resulted in someone physically taping a threatening note to his door that included overhead photos of him walking his dog. NPR, which broke the story, had also corroborated it with internal documents.

On April 19, Musk reposted a claim that Berulis had fabricated his report, captioning it: “Filing a deliberately false whistleblower claim is a serious crime.” The next day, Berulis got into his car and discovered his brakes had failed. He ran into a curb after calling his legal team. A police officer who arrived on the scene noted a cut wire under the hood and photographed it.

Police collected fingerprints, and Berulis provided video of a drone he had observed flying above his house. Police later closed the investigation after being unable to identify a suspect. The identity of whoever cut the brake line has never been determined, and there is no evidence connecting Musk to the incident.

In April 2026, Berulis filed a defamation lawsuit against Musk, alleging he showed “reckless disregard” for whether the accusations against Berulis were accurate. That lawsuit is ongoing.

See less

 

 

 

600,000 views on TikTok. 49,000 likes on Reddit. Covered by Yahoo, Futurism, TechRadar, and Cleveland Magazine.

All from a four-minute speech. At a city council meeting. In Ravenna, Ohio. Population: 11,000.

The man who gave it is not a politician. Not a celebrity. Not a billionaire with a rival agenda.

He is, Will Hollingsworth — a former programmer, content creator, and digital artist who, in his own words, spent years working with AI and trained “the very machine that would eventually replace me.”

And what he said at that microphone — in four minutes — has become the defining statement of the entire data center debate in America.

Read every word. Then share it with everyone you know.

THE SPEECH THAT STOPPED A CITY COUNCIL COLD

On April 10, 2026, nearly 100 people packed the chambers of Ravenna City Council in Ohio — overflowing into the hallways — for a debate over a proposed 12-month moratorium on data center construction in the area.

Will Hollingsworth walked up to the microphone. He had four minutes.

What he said in those four minutes has been shared millions of times. And it deserves to be shared millions more.

He began by establishing something critical — his credibility:

“I am not against technology. I am not against AI. I have worked in tech. Furthermore, I have worked with AI models. I helped build the systems that are now driving this boom. Likewise, I understand what these facilities do — and I understand what they cost.”

Then he said the sentence that went around the world:

“We are being asked to drain our reservoirs, so a chatbot can write a poem or so our sheriff can generate a picture of himself standing next to Bigfoot.” 

The room erupted in laughter. And then it went very quiet. Because everyone in that room understood exactly what he meant.

“THEY ARE NOT AN EMPLOYER. THEY ARE AN EXTRACTION.”

Hollingsworth then delivered the most devastating economic argument against data centers that anyone has put into plain English — in a single sentence.

“A big employer who uses the water of 50,000 people — which only hires about ten people — is not an employer. They are an extraction.” 

An extraction. Not a job creator. Not an economic engine. An extraction.

That word — extraction — captures in one syllable what researchers, economists, and community advocates have been trying to explain in lengthy reports and complicated charts for years.

A data center comes to your town. It takes your water. It takes your electricity. Likewise, it takes your land. It takes your quiet. It takes your road capacity. Furthermore, it takes your grid stability.

And it gives back: ten permanent jobs. Maybe fifteen.

That is not economic development. That is extraction. And Will Hollingsworth — a man who spent his career in tech — was the one who finally said it out loud, in public, at a microphone, in four minutes.

THE LINE THAT MADE 49,000 PEOPLE ON REDDIT STOP SCROLLING

Hollingsworth described what a data center does to a community’s water supply in terms that every single American can understand — no technical degree required.

“These facilities can use millions of gallons of water per day,” he said. “We are being asked to drain our reservoirs, so a chatbot can write a poem.” 

Millions of gallons. Per day. From Ravenna, Ohio. Population 11,000.

One Reddit user responded: “God damn that was good. Seriously this should be used as a script in every county these corporations are hustling.” 

Another wrote: “Lies, lies and more lies from megacorps invested up to their eyeballs in having just a few people in government believe them.” 

49,000 likes. For a speech at a city council meeting in a town of 11,000 people.

Because what Hollingsworth said is what millions of Americans across this country have been feeling — and nobody in power had put it so clearly before.

THE DETAIL THAT MAKES THIS STORY EVEN MORE POWERFUL

Here is what makes Will Hollingsworth different from every other data center opponent — and why his speech landed with such extraordinary force.

Will Hollingsworth is a former programmer, content creator, and digital artist who used Midjourney in his role and — in his own words — trained “the very machine that would eventually replace me.” 

He did not just lose his job to AI. He helped build the AI that took it. He contributed his expertise, his skills, and his years of work to the exact technology that is now driving the data center boom that threatens his community’s water and electricity.

He is not a technophobe. He is not anti-progress. He is a man who gave the AI industry everything he had — and watched it take his job, and then come for his town’s reservoir.

“I have moral obligations. I have environmental obligations. And as a tech person, I have ethical obligations to where I feel like I need to speak out on this.” 

Moral obligations. Environmental obligations. Ethical obligations.

From a man who helped build AI. Standing at a city council microphone. In a town of 11,000 people. Fighting for the water his neighbors drink.

AND THEN CAME THE LINE THAT BROKE EVERYONE IN THE ROOM

Hollingsworth closed his four-minute speech with a sentence so simple and so powerful that it silenced the entire chamber.

“I am not a cynic when it comes to technology,” he concluded. “I am a believer in community. I believe that a drop of clean water for a Ravenna child is worth more than a billion AI generated images. Let us choose the child.” 

Let us choose the child.

Not the server. Not the chatbot. Not the billion-dollar corporation that wants to drain the reservoir.

The child.

That sentence — six words — became the rallying cry of an entire movement. It was shared on TikTok 600,000 times. It was quoted on Reddit 49,000 times. It was covered by Yahoo, Futurism, TechRadar, and every major tech publication in America.

Because it is not a political statement. It is not a partisan argument. It is not a complicated policy position.

It is just the truth. Simple, clear, and undeniable.

A child’s clean water is worth more than a billion AI-generated images.

AND THEN SOMETHING EXTRAORDINARY HAPPENED

By clearly, calmly, and articulately laying out the problems, the committee voted for a one-year moratorium on all new data center projects in the Ravenna-Shalersville area. Reasons cited were exactly the speaker’s points: the water footprint of AI and the environmental risks of forever chemicals. 

One man. Four minutes. A moratorium.

In Ravenna, Ohio. Population 11,000. Against some of the most powerful and well-funded corporations on earth.

Hollingsworth later said: “It has proven that this might be one of the very first, in a long time — at least in the last 10 years — actually bipartisan issues where it’s more important than party lines. This is more important than supporting a red or a blue candidate. This is about the environment. This is about our health.” 

More important than party lines. More important than red or blue. More important than who you voted for in the last election.

A drop of clean water for a child. That is what this is about.

And a former programmer who helped build AI — standing at a microphone in a town of 11,000 — just proved that one person, with four minutes and the truth, can change everything.

SHARE this post and make sure every American hears Will Hollingsworth’s four-minute speech. Share it for every community that has felt ignored. Share it for every child whose water is being drained. Share it for every family that was never asked. FOLLOW this page — and never miss the stories that matter. 

Comment below: Does Will Hollingsworth’s line — “a drop of clean water for a child is worth more than a billion AI-generated images” — speak for you? YES or NO — and what state are you from? Let’s make this the most shared post on this page. 

Sources: Futurism — April 17, 2026 | Tech Radar — April 13, 2026 | Yahoo News — April 17, 2026 | Cleveland Magazine — May 2026 | Reddit r/pcmasterrace — 49,000 likes | TikTok — Will Hollingsworth, 600,000+ views | Ravenna City Council Official Vote Record — April 10, 2026