Cuts free breakfast and lunch programs at public schools across America.. defunding public schools/ children's education, cuts social security, cuts Medicare too, not just Medicaid. Raises the premiums of other health care insurances to the point of being absolutely unaffordable. Higher groceries, increase in gas prices. AND IT PAYS FOR THEM TO BUILD CONCENTRATION CAMPS WITH INCINERATORS IN THEM!! If they are deporting people why do they need concentration camps? And you might want to ask yourself why the fuck they need incinerators built in them too when you're done?!

A pedophile and 1% of his billionaire friends (83 ppl) like Elon Musk.. no longer have to pay taxes while the taxpayers ( 344 million ppl, like you & me) ours increases. A lot of this is already taking place in many states especially Northern parts of North America.. the rest doesn't even take effect until the end of 2026, ( after midterms ) this is what you all been cheering on, the increase of your own struggles.. making it harder to live and survive.. while your peace president bombs 8 separate countries in less than 14 months, steals oil from them and puts the money in an offshore Qatar account that only he has control or access to.. doesn't even benefit the United States citizens ( you) or the United States change purse in ANY way whatsoever.

The so-called big beautiful bill.. is beautiful for the predator in Chief and his millionaire/billionaire friends. NOT YOU & NOT YOUR FAMILY! Go ahead, keep blaming Harris, Biden, Obama tho.. hell, anybody but Trump.. keep cheering on our own downfall. For it is imminent. While the rest of us cannot wait for a big beautiful obituary!

( I KNOW TRUTH IS THE NEW HATE SPEECH TO THOSE WHO HATE THE TRUTH )

Maybe you should do your homework and look into exactly what some of these bills are and do some homework on the people that you're voting for. Because the truth is Donnie said he was doing this from day one. It's called project 2025! And it is nothing but taking and breaking down from you. Not the wealthy.. JUST US! You're cheering on the breaking down and taking away from not only yourselves and your family but your children as well. MAKE SURE YOU CHEER ON GOLDEN ARCHES AND GOLDEN EPSTEIN BALLROOMS TOO WHILE YOU'RE AT IT CUZ THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE DOING! And you look real dumb doing it. P. S. AND DONALD TRUMP IS STILL A 34 TIME CONVICTED FELON/ SERIAL PREDATOR who has already been charged and found guilty not once not twice but three separate times for sexual abuse and rape in the state of New York. Donald Trump is still mentioned in the Epstein files more than any other individual.. ( over 1 million × & Mar-A-Lago is the number one mentioned location in all of the Epstein files ) that's how dumb you look supporting this weirdo and his fucked up friends!

 

Project 2025 is happening quietly in the background and we're so distracted by the insanity, we don't even realize it.
Been down the rabbit hole and followed links to sites like https://ncua.gov/news/ deregulation-project where you'll find that credit unions are in the middle of a deregulation project based off of one of Trump's executive orders. If you read the substack below, you'll see this is all from the Project 2025 playbook.
Regulations exist to protect the consumer, you, us, we the people. And without those regulations, banks will do whatever shady shit they feel like to make sure THEIR bottom dollar increases, not yours.
There is something we can do though.
They make policy change proposals that are open to the public for comment. We can go tell them that we don't want deregulation. They have one up to remove verbiage about refunding interest to you. They say it's duplicative, well, ask yourself why? Why would they have duplicative verbiage on something like that unless it was because there were gaps or loopholes in the original verbiage which wasn't in favor of the consumer? Do we know that 100% for sure? No. But this admin has worked for a large bank and knows they don't duplicate anything, they cover tracks.
There's another proposal to remove regulations for reputational risk. Sounds like no big deal, but do you remember the Wells Fargo scandal, when they were caught creating accounts in people's names without permission, so branch workers could meet goals? The massive loss in confidence from the public that came from that, THAT is reputational risk. So what do you think they will try to get away with if there's no regulations?

You have a voice in so much more than just calling your reps. Go read through some of these proposals and leave comments. Especially if you bank with a credit union. (We'll look into other websites for regular banks to see if there's a similar option and post if we find anything.)
https://www.regulations.gov/document/NCUA-2026-0266-0001
 

Mainstream science is openly talking about implantable nanosensors for in vivo monitoring.

Read that again.

A published paper in the Journal of Nanobiotechnology discusses in-vivo fluorescent nanosensor implants using hydrogel-encapsulated sensors, noting that nanosensors are being developed for biological signaling, environmental sensing, and continuous monitoring inside living organisms.

The paper also discusses tissue response, inflammation, functional lifetime, and how these implanted systems interact with the body over time.

Read it here in the documents section of our website -> https://www.MindNexusLive.com/documents

Why does that matter?

Because at Mind Nexus, we are documenting patterns people have been talking about for years. And when we run our Non-Linear Junction Detection scans, we are looking for silicon-based anomalies via nonlinear harmonic responses. In plain terms, we are documenting semiconductor-related activity on/around a person and within the environment.

So people should be asking real questions.

If mainstream research is openly discussing implanted nanosensors, hydrogel encapsulation, and long-term in-vivo function, why are people still mocked for questioning what may already be in use beyond the public view?

If the science world is openly building systems for continuous monitoring inside living organisms, where does that road end?

And if the future they are selling is a world of constant sensing, constant data collection, and constant tracking, is that really just “innovation” or is it part of a much bigger control grid?

The ultimate plan has always looked like total monitoring your body, your behavior, your biometrics, your movement, and your environment.

A global tracking system does not arrive all at once.

It arrives piece by piece, sold as progress, safety, medicine, convenience, and optimization.

Are these technologies only being used for what the public is told?

Scanning is NOT a medical diagnosis. Our scans detect anomalous frequencies around a person and within the environment, not inside the body. Findings are for informational purposes only and can support personal investigations.

 

 

 

The United Snakes Of Israel

In Matthew 23:13-39 The Savior said

"Woe therefore be unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because ye shut up the kingdom of heaven before men: for ye yourselves go not in, neither suffer ye them that would enter, to come in. Woe be unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: for ye devour widows’ houses, even under a color of long prayers: wherefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. Woe be unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: for ye compass sea and land to make one of your profession: and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell, than you yourselves. Woe be unto you blind guides, which say, Whosoever sweareth by the Temple, it is nothing: but whosoever sweareth by the gold of the Temple, he offendeth. Ye fools and blind, Whether is greater, the gold, or the Temple that sanctifieth the gold? And whosoever sweareth by the altar, it is nothing: but whosoever sweareth by the offering that is upon it, offendeth.

Ye fools and blind, whether is greater, the offering, or the altar which sanctifieth the offering Whosoever therefore sweareth by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. And whosoever sweareth by the Temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. And he that sweareth by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth theron. Woe be to you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: for ye tithe mint, and anise, and cummin, and leave the weightier matters of the law, as judgment, and mercy and fidelity. These ought ye to have done, and not to have left the other. Ye blind guides, which strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel. Woe be to you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: for ye make clean the utter side of the cup, and of the platter: but within they are full of bribery and excess. Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first the inside of the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. Woe be to you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: for ye are like unto whited tombs, which appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and all filthiness. So are ye also: for outward ye appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

Woe be unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites: for ye build the tombs of the Prophets, and garnish the sepulchers of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partners with them in the blood of the Prophets. So then ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them that murdered the Prophets. Fulfill ye also the measure of your fathers. O serpents, the generation of vipers, how should ye escape the damnation of hell! Wherefore behold, I send unto you Prophets, and wise men, and Scribes, and of them ye shall kill and crucify: and of them shall ye scourge in your Synagogues, and persecute from city to city, That upon you may come all the righteous blood that was shed upon the earth, from the blood of Abel the righteous, unto the blood of Zechariah the son of Berechiah, whom ye slew between the Temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, all these things shall come upon this generation. Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the Prophets, and stonest them which are sent to thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, as the hen gathered her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your habitation shall be left unto you desolate. For I say unto you, ye shall not see me henceforth till that ye say, Blessed is he that cometh in the Name of the Lord."

FAIR USE NOTICE: FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLAR- SHIP, AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING.

The Twenty Million Dollar Secret: What the Chief Justice Hoped You Would Never See

Written by: Mitch Jackson

For twenty years, Chief Justice John Roberts told the country he placed the Court above everything else. For sixteen of those same years, his household collected millions in undisclosed income from the firms arguing cases in front of him.

Last week, on April 22, 2026, an investigative journalist named Christopher Armitage filed a 142 page disbarment complaint against him with the District of Columbia Bar. If accurate and true, the numbers in the filing tell a different story.1

I have practiced law in California for nearly four decades. I have sat as Judge Pro Tem. The recusal rules I am about to walk you through are the same rules every working trial judge in America applies to themselves on a normal Monday morning before taking the bench. These rules apparently stopped at the Chief Justice’s chamber door for sixteen years running.

Stay with me. Once you see what is in the public record, every closely divided ruling of the past two decades looks different.

The Money

Jane Sullivan Roberts is the wife of the Chief Justice. In May 2007, two years after her husband joined the Supreme Court, she left her partnership at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman and joined Major, Lindsey and Africa as a legal recruiter. The job involved placing senior lawyers at the largest firms in Washington and New York. The placements paid commissions. Big commissions.

Whistleblower documents and arbitration spreadsheets show she earned $10,323,842.70 in commissions between 2007 and 2014 alone, on $13.3 million in attributed firm revenue. Documented placements include former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to WilmerHale in 2013, attorney Robert Bennett to Hogan Lovells in 2009, former United States Attorney Neil MacBride to Davis Polk in 2013, and former New York Federal Reserve General Counsel Michael Held to WilmerHale in 2022.

WilmerHale and Hogan Lovells are not random firms. WilmerHale’s Supreme Court practice is led by former Solicitor General Seth Waxman, who has personally argued 85 cases before the Court. Hogan Lovells argued eight Supreme Court cases in 2024 alone. Hogan Lovells is the successor to Hogan and Hartson, the firm where John Roberts himself practiced law before joining the bench.

The complaint filed last week aggregates household income from firms appearing before the Court at over twenty million dollars across Jane Roberts’s two recruiting employers. The filing alleges more than five hundred cases argued by paying firms with no recusal on spousal income grounds. Twelve of the placements, according to the complaint, were finalized within ninety days of the placing firm filing a petition for certiorari before the Supreme Court.

The Disclosure Lie

Every federal judge files a yearly financial disclosure form under the Ethics in Government Act. The form asks the judge to identify the source, type, and amount of income. Salary and commissions are different categories of compensation. Salary is fixed pay for showing up. Commissions are deal based payments tied to specific transactions and specific clients. The two structures create entirely different conflict patterns. The law wants the public to see the difference.

For more than a decade of disclosure forms, Chief Justice Roberts described his wife’s compensation as salary. Pace University law professor Bennett Gershman issued an opinion calling the characterization incorrect as a matter of law. Richard Painter, the chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush and the man who personally prepared Roberts for his confirmation hearings, told reporters Roberts fudged the details.

In April 2023, Business Insider published the whistleblower spreadsheets. Two months later, when the Administrative Office released Roberts’s 2022 calendar year disclosure, the description of his wife’s income had quietly changed from salary to base salary and commission. The same filing disclosed for the first time an equity interest in Jane Roberts’s employer Macrae Inc., valued between one hundred thousand and two hundred fifty thousand dollars. The Chief Justice acknowledged the equity had existed since his wife joined Macrae in 2019, omitted from three prior annual filings. He attributed the omission to inadvertence.

Read more: https://mitchthelawyer.substack.com/.../the-twenty...