May 18, 2026

 

After her affair became public since she was a married woman, and committed adultery, her scarlet letter  ended her silly-ass radio program and her career in its entirety. 

In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance.

The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations.

A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24.

The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.

4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odour for the Lord - Lev.1:9.

The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

5. I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death.

Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your adoring fan.

James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia

(It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian)

 

 

 

Ex-CIA Officer Claims JFK Files Are Hidden Because They Would Expose Israel

John Kiriakou claims there are still around 10,000 unreleased files related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and says the real reason they remain hidden is not “national security” or “sources and methods,” but Israel.

Kiriakou argues the official explanation makes no sense anymore because anyone involved in intelligence operations from 1963 would now be dead, and Cold War spy methods are obsolete in the digital age.

According to him, the hidden files are actually protecting a political relationship, not intelligence secrets.

What is the core claim?

Kiriakou says the real conflict began because JFK strongly opposed Israel obtaining nuclear weapons.

In the early 1960s, Israel was secretly developing the Dimona nuclear facility. Kennedy reportedly demanded unrestricted inspections to confirm whether the site was for peaceful energy or nuclear weapons development.

Kiriakou claims Israeli leadership saw JFK’s pressure as an existential threat.

He specifically points to David Ben-Gurion resigning in 1963 during the height of the dispute over Dimona.

According to Kiriakou, the unreleased files allegedly contain:

• NSA intercepts

• CIA intelligence reports

• Diplomatic cables

• Communications showing extreme hostility toward JFK from Israeli officials before the assassination

He says the documents would reveal how aggressively Israeli leadership and pro-Israel networks were trying to pressure or bypass Kennedy’s policies.

Important point:

Kiriakou explicitly says he is NOT claiming Mossad assassinated JFK.

Instead, he argues the files would expose a much darker geopolitical conflict happening behind the scenes before Kennedy’s death.

His main argument is that releasing those files today could severely damage US-Israel relations because the public would see how intense the confrontation over nuclear weapons really was.

For decades, the JFK assassination has produced endless theories involving:

• The CIA

• The Mafia

• Cuba

• The Soviet Union

• Israel

• Military and intelligence networks

the continued secrecy around thousands of JFK records keeps fueling speculation around what the government may still be hiding more than 60 years later.

If the remaining JFK files are truly harmless, why are thousands of them still partially hidden after six decades?

#ukashaexplains

Fascism has always understood something that liberal democracies pretend not to understand, spectacle is governance. Not policy, not truth, not ethics, but theater. The rally, the celebrity, the televised humiliation, the choreographed outrage. Hitler understood it. Mussolini understood it. They recognized that if you can turn politics into emotional pageantry, millions of people will begin confusing participation with freedom, obedience with belonging.

The terrifying part is not that the masses are “fooled.” It is that modern society conditions people to crave the very structures degrading them. A population exhausted by precarity, debt, isolation, algorithmic overstimulation, and nonstop manufactured fear eventually begins seeking comfort in authority itself. Stockholm Syndrome ceases to be metaphorical. People become emotionally attached to systems actively brutalizing them.

 

 Today the spectacle arrives through different costumes. Reality television. Billionaire influencer culture. Manufactured cancellation cycles. Endless media rituals designed not to inform, but to emotionally exhaust. Every scandal becomes entertainment content. Every atrocity competes with celebrity gossip. Politics is flattened into branding.

This is where figures like Sharon Osbourne become culturally significant, not because she alone controls anything, but because celebrity elites function as emotional middle-management for empire. Wealthy personalities normalize cruelty while presenting it as “honesty,” nationalism while presenting it as “common sense,” and dehumanization while presenting it as “strength.” Whether through Zionist apologism, nationalist rhetoric, or elite gatekeeping, the role is the same, to translate systems of domination into digestible entertainment.

And that relationship between celebrity culture and authoritarian politics is not accidental. Fascism requires spectators. It needs people trained to consume politics passively, emotionally, aesthetically. The rally becomes the concert. The war becomes the livestream. The suffering becomes content.

Meanwhile, the language of resistance itself gets commodified. “Counterculture” is sold back to people as fashion branding while actual anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist movements are surveilled, fragmented, or buried under noise. Even rebellion becomes spectacle. Especially rebellion.

That is why modern anti-fascism cannot merely oppose individual politicians or isolated movements. It has to confront the machinery of emotional manipulation itself. The corporate media systems. The billionaire-owned platforms. The celebrity ecosystems. The endless psychological conditioning that teaches people to identify with power rather than with each other.

Because fascism in the 21st century rarely announces itself with uniforms first. It arrives as entertainment. As identity performance. As addictive spectacle.

As a culture so saturated with distraction and fear that people stop recognizing their own alienation and begin defending the forces creating it.

The antidote is not cynicism. Cynicism is another form of surrender. The antidote is rebuilding political consciousness rooted in solidarity rather than spectacle, human dignity rather than branding, and collective liberation rather than the desperate search for strong personalities to worship.

History shows us that authoritarianism thrives when societies become emotionally fragmented and politically illiterate. But history also shows that ordinary people, once they recover the ability to see clearly through the theater, become impossible to govern through fear alone.