This report dropped just hours ago. Published this morning by NBC News. Based on a brand-new study that is already shaking Silicon Valley to its core.

In just 90 days — January, February, and March 2026 — ordinary American citizens with no lobbyists, no corporate lawyers, and no billions of dollars stopped Big Tech dead in its tracks.

The number is almost impossible to believe. But it is real. It is verified. And it changes everything.     $130 BILLION. BLOCKED. IN 90 DAYS.

A new study conducted by Data Center Watch — a project of AI intelligence firm 10a Labs that tracks local data center activity — found that data center opponents blocked or delayed at least 75 projects nationwide worth about $130 billion from January through March 2026. That is the most blocked and delayed data center projects ever recorded in a single three-month period since tracking began in 2023. 

75 projects. $130 billion. In 90 days.

To put that in perspective — $130 billion is more than the entire annual GDP of Hungary. More than the annual revenue of Walmart. Stopped — not by governments, not by regulators, not by courts — but by regular Americans who showed up and said no.

The total number and value of data centers blocked or delayed during just the first three months of 2026 roughly matched the total for ALL of 2025 combined. 

Everything that took an entire year to block in 2025 — communities matched it in just one quarter of 2026.

This is not a trend. This is an avalanche. THE STUDY THAT SENT SHOCKWAVES THROUGH SILICON VALLEY.

The researchers at Data Center Watch did not just count the blocked projects. They explained exactly why this is happening — and their conclusion is the part Big Tech least wants you to read.

The authors wrote: “The quarter reflected a structural shift rather than a cyclical spike: communities have internalized an opposition playbook, legislative sessions introduced formal regulatory uncertainty, and the number of active opposition groups more than doubled to 833 across 49 states.” 

A structural shift. Not a spike. Not a temporary protest. A permanent, organized, nationwide movement that has now taken root in 49 of America’s 50 states.

Data Center Watch stated that opposition to data centers has “consolidated into a national political force” — adding that “what began as individual zoning disputes is now reshaping elections, regulation, and site viability nationwide.” 

Individual zoning disputes. That is how this started — neighbors showing up to complain at a county meeting. Now it is reshaping elections. Replacing politicians. Rewriting laws. And blocking $130 billion in 90 days.

THE RUMOR OF A DATA CENTER IS NOW ENOUGH TO TRIGGER A REVOLT

Here is the detail in today’s study that stopped every data center executive in their tracks.

The study found: “In some cases, opposition mobilized before any project was officially filed. The mere rumor of a data center was enough to trigger organized resistance.” 

Not an announcement. Not a permit application. Not a groundbreaking ceremony.

A rumor.

Communities are now so organized, so alert, and so determined that the moment anyone hears a whisper that a data center might be coming — the resistance begins. Before a single document is filed. Before a single acre of land changes hands.

Big Tech used to be able to quietly file permits, quietly buy land, quietly start construction — and by the time communities figured out what was happening, it was too late.

Those days are over.

AND THE LAWMAKERS ARE FOLLOWING THE PEOPLE

The grassroots movement did not just block projects. It forced politicians to act — fast.

More than 300 bills were introduced in statehouses across the country just in the first six weeks of 2026 alone — marking what researchers described as “a clear shift from incentive-focused policies toward regulatory oversight as the scale of energy demands became clearer.” 

300 bills. In six weeks. In legislatures across America. From red states to blue states. From Oklahoma to New York. From Texas to Maine.

Three years ago — data centers were handing out press releases and politicians were lining up for ribbon-cutting ceremonies.

Today — 300 bills in six weeks. All driven by the same force: ordinary Americans who got fed up and showed up.

AND YET BIG TECH IS NOT BACKING DOWN — IT IS DOUBLING DOWN

Here is the part of today’s story that makes this a true David vs. Goliath battle for the ages.

On May 11, Moody’s Ratings raised its capital spending projections for the top six U.S. hyperscalers — Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, Meta, Alphabet, Oracle, and CoreWeave — to $785 billion for 2026 and nearly $1 trillion for 2027. 

$785 billion this year. $1 trillion next year. From just six companies.

Against 833 grassroots opposition groups. Armed with community meetings, petitions, and votes.

That dynamic — community opposition steam rolled by corporate momentum — is playing out across America at accelerating speed. 

Big Tech is spending more. Communities are fighting harder. And right now — today — the communities are winning more often than anyone in Silicon Valley predicted possible.

In the town of Saline, Michigan, residents voted against a $16 billion data center in their backyard. Weeks later — construction began anyway. 

The people voted. The company built anyway.

That single sentence explains why 833 opposition groups now exist across 49 states. Because democracy was ignored. And Americans do not forget that.

TWO OUT OF EVERY THREE FIGHTS — COMMUNITIES ARE WINNING

And here is the number that should give every community in America hope — and every data center executive nightmares.

Opposition groups were successful in blocking or delaying two out of every three projects they protested — underscoring the growing impact of organized local resistance. 

Two out of three. When communities organize and fight — they win the majority of the time.

This is not a movement that is losing. This is a movement that is winning. Consistently. Repeatedly. Across 49 states.

Every town council member who supported Amazon’s proposed data center in Warrenton, Virginia has subsequently lost re-election — starting in 2023 and continuing through every election since. 

Every single one. Lost their seat. Because they chose Amazon over their community.

Politicians across America are reading that sentence very carefully right now.

 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT — AND WHY THE NEXT 90 DAYS ARE EVEN MORE IMPORTANT

Today’s study covers January through March. The second quarter of 2026 — April, May, and June — is not yet fully counted. But the early signals suggest the numbers will be even larger.

The New York moratorium bill passed both chambers. Nashville’s zoo petition hit 386,000 signatures. Nassau County voted for a full pause. North Carolina is fighting to protect its aquifers. Ohio farmers are battling eminent domain proposals. The EPA said it won’t protect communities. And 833 opposition groups — across 49 states — are more organized today than they were on January 1.

As Data Center Watch concluded in its report published today: “As political resistance builds and local organizing becomes more coordinated, this is now a sustained and intensifying trend.” 

Sustained. Intensifying. Nationwide.

$130 billion blocked in 90 days. By regular Americans. With no corporate backing. No billionaire donors. No armies of lobbyists.

Just neighbors. Showing up. Saying no.

And winning.

This study was published TODAY by NBC News — just hours ago. SHARE this post so every American knows that their community has the POWER to stop Big Tech — and that 833 groups across 49 states are already proving it. FOLLOW this page for the most important and most current data center news in America, updated every single day. 

 Comment below: Does it give you HOPE that ordinary Americans are blocking $130 BILLION in data center projects — or do you think Big Tech will ultimately win? Tell us what you think!

 

 Sources: NBC News — June 12, 2026 (Published TODAY, 10 hours ago) | AOL / NBC News — June 12, 2026 | International Business Times — June 12, 2026 (Published 2 hours ago) | 

 

 

ESCAPE OR RESPONSIBILITY? 

 Elon Musk asks a grand question:

Should humanity invest in ambitious technologies to become a multi-planetary species and secure its long-term survival?

Gil Scott-Heron asks a different question.

What obligations do societies have to solve urgent problems on Earth before pursuing distant frontiers?

What they're really arguing about isn't Mars alone.

It's priorities.

One side sees exploration, innovation, and long-term survival as essential investments in humanity's future.

The other asks whether technological ambition risks overshadowing immediate human needs such as poverty, inequality, and environmental challenges.

The deeper question is:

How should societies balance preparing for the future with caring for the present?

History repeatedly shows that civilizations are shaped by both visionaries and critics.

Progress requires imagination.

But philosophy asks who benefit from that progress and who is left behind.

Perhaps the challenge is remembering that these goals do not have to be mutually exclusive.

Because the measure of a civilization is not only whether it can reach new worlds…

…but whether it can improve life on the one it already inhabits.

Is anyone else watching what’s happening in Sacramento right now? The hypocrisy is honestly unreal.

Right now, Gavin Newsom is using taxpayer-funded staff to file aggressive federal FOIA requests demanding the DOJ hand over records about the investigations into him and his wife. When he wants answers, transparency is an absolute right.

But look at what California lawmakers are trying to do to the rest of us at the exact same time. They are quietly pushing Assembly Bill 1821, which will absolutely gut the California Public Records Act. If this passes, everyday citizens, local journalists, and whistleblowers will be completely locked out of holding the government accountable at a state AND local level.

Here is what they are trying to accomplish……

Pay-to-play

Agencies will be allowed to charge you anywhere from $22 to $66+ AN HOUR just for staff to look for public documents. (which they are already paid to do).

A basic request could end up costing you thousands of dollars.

The government will actually get the power to sue YOU if they decide your records request has "malicious intent." Example…if you are trying to uncover corruption you believe is happening in your hometown…

Imagine getting taken to court just for asking questions. 

It gives agencies more time to stall, and lets them hit you with an $88/hour fee if they decide your request is for "commercial use."  yes… say you post it on FB or other social media platforms… that could be deemed commercial, especially if you get paid for your content.

It is the ultimate definition of "rules for thee, but not for me." Newsom gets to weaponize transparency laws for his own personal defense, while his party strips those exact same rights away from the people of California.

Keep an eye on AB 1821 people…if this passes you will have challenges on keeping an eye on our government. Why should the rest of this country care? Well we all know he will be running for president next and this is what the rest of the country can expect for themselves as well.

 

 

We've all heard of Peter Thiel's "secret society" by now, and WIRED just dropped a new investigation that claims Dialog, the invite-only "secret society" co-founded by Thiel, secretly ranks its members using an internal scoring system based on factors such as wealth, influence, fame, and perceived value to the group.

According to leaked records, members and prospective attendees receive letter grades (A, B, or C), with the highest-ranking participants often being some of the most influential people in politics, technology, finance, media, and government. The organization also assigns "value-add" scores that help determine who gets invited, who sits with whom, who moderates discussions, and in some cases whether someone remains part of the network.

The documents suggest Dialog tracks personal information, professional connections, political leanings, and relationship networks to help curate interactions, almost like surveillance of the wealthy. The group also uses algorithms and staff evaluations to recommend introductions, arrange seating, and optimize networking opportunities among attendees.

Wildly, some members can reportedly be downgraded or removed for reasons such as "poor culture fit," declining influence, or insufficient value to the community (shows you how these people see the world). The leaked records also reveal that membership status and rankings may affect event pricing, with some attendees paying significantly different fees for the same gatherings.

What this looks like to me is a private network where some of the world's most powerful people are quietly ranking one another, building relationships, and shaping influence outside public view - the very thing many of us have been saying is a huge part of what decides the direction of the world.

I'll ask those who have denied this stuff for a long time, if influence increasingly flows through powerful, invisible, private networks rather than public institutions, how much of society's future is being shaped in rooms most people will never enter or hear about what happens in?

Consider AI for one second, we realize how powerful that tech is and how it's going to reshape the entire world soon. A handful of people are not only building out where AI goes but ultimately deciding what it builds. Power is indeed concentrated in the wealthy. Democracy is an illusion to keep the public pacified.

One step further, we're literally seeing a network influencing the world that has a worldview of 'ranking people' by values based entirely on non-intrinsic qualities. Funny enough, this is exactly why these powerful people don't value the average person, love, nature, water, a tree, animals etc. Their worldview is foundationally a story of separation rather than love or interconnection, and yet they are deciding where the world goes.

By Joe Martino, CE founder

The American public is constantly told that the MAGA movement is a grassroots crusade against the establishment. We are told they are fighting for the forgotten man and woman against a corrupt global elite. But while those politicians stir up chaos to distract us, the people pulling the strings are busy building their own private, insulated reality. Wired just exposed a list of over 200 members belonging to a secretive group called Dialog, run by billionaire Peter Thiel. This is not just a club for the wealthy; it is a shadow network of power brokers, investors, and political operators who are quietly mapping out the future of our society behind closed doors.

When you look at who is involved and how these circles operate, the parallels to other notorious elite cabals become impossible to ignore. They claim to represent the people, but their actions prove they only serve themselves. This is the blueprint for oligarchy—an infrastructure designed to bypass democratic institutions entirely. We are witnessing the solidification of a ruling class that believes it is above the reach of public accountability. If we do not recognize this for the danger it truly is, we are choosing to let them own the future.

See less

 

Americans Against Fascism