BREAKING: HOLY SMOKES! Bombshell report accuses Trump and Rubio of "the largest fraud in the history of the U.S. immigration system" amounting to over $1.3 billion stolen from migrants.

And the details will absolutely enrage you...

According to the Cato Institute, a right-wing think tank, Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and outgoing DHS Secretary Kristi Noem extracted at least $1.3 billion from migrants in fees for visa processing and other immigration services that they never intended to provide. They took the money, then took no steps to hold up their end of the agreement.

The administration is taking money from immigrant hopefuls from over 90 countries despite the fact that Trump's own xenophobic travel bans have made it so that those same people are "banned from receiving immigrant visas and immigrating permanently to the United States." Trump is having it both ways: taking the money he would get for allowing immigration while simultaneously blocking that immigration.

"During testimony before the US Senate, I called it the largest fraud in the history of the US immigration system. In fact, it is likely the first $1 billion fraud—a theft of processing fees for services never rendered," wrote David J. Bier for Cato.

But the corruption goes so much deeper...

Rubio's State Department has issued internal rules that prohibit his staff from informing the migrants in question that they have no chance of success and their money is essentially being stolen. It's a systemic graft operation.

“Cubans represent the largest group of affected applicants with nearly a million affected applications at a combined cost of $543 million. The second most common was Venezuelans, with 239,000 applications at a cost of $138 million,” Cato reports.

Cato estimates that over 2 million immigrant applicants were affected by the travel bans and had their money taken when there no intention on the part of the administration of rendering the services in question.

"The fees came primarily from applications for work permits and filings to adjust status to permanent residence or immigrant visas—the two ways in which people receive green cards to stay permanently in the United States," writes Bier.

Congress must immediately investigate this blatant, rampant fraud and begin the long, difficult process of ensuring that every single victim is paid back with interest. These people came looking for a better life in the United States and were instead fleeced for what little money they had. This is a kind of cruelty and greed that could only exist with Donald Trump as president.

 

 

They can redraw the borders, but they can never erase the soil. This 1946 map of historical Palestine isn't just paper and ink—it is the pulse of a nation, the memory of every olive grove, and the undeniable proof of a homeland that lives in our hearts forever.

#Palestine #FreePalestine #HistoryOfPalestine #Nakba #StandWithPalestine #فلسطين #القدس #Palestine1946 #RightOfReturn #SavePalestine

 The billionaires, the Supreme Court, Netanyahu, and all his Congressional and Senatorial allies, Corporate America and the Republican Party put him in not once but twice to destroy America from within, and it looks like the job was not only successfully done but actually overkill. America is now the pile of shit they made it in the eyes of the world. We are finished as a leader and a superpower. We are the laughingstock that disgusts the entire world.

 

 

And while Americans are trying to shoot down Shahed drones worth about $50,000 with up to three Patriot missiles costing $3 million+ each ...

Zelensky has already gone directly to the Middle Eastern nations under attack and started helping them defend themselves.

The country that learned to shoot down Iranian drones over Kyiv is now teaching Gulf nations how to shoot them down over refineries. Nobody asked Trump. The Gulf asked Ukraine.

President Volodymyr Zelensky said on March 18 that 201 Ukrainian military specialists are already deployed across the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, with teams heading to Kuwait and more prepared to go.

These are active-duty Ukrainian military personnel, not private contractors. They are sharing combat experience gained from three years of intercepting Iranian-made Shahed drones over cities, power grids, and civilian infrastructure.

The Gulf states requested this help themselves. Saudi Arabia reportedly approached Ukraine directly.

The deal is simple: Ukraine provides battle-tested drone interception expertise, and the Gulf provides funding, technology, and air defense systems that Ukraine badly needs.

Zelensky specifically mentioned Patriot systems as part of that exchange. The country struggling to get enough Patriots from the West is now earning them by sharing the knowledge it learned under fire.

This deployment was not requested or coordinated by Washington. It is a direct arrangement between Ukraine and Gulf governments.

Ukraine built a parallel channel that helps both sides. Ukraine gains resources and air defense support, while Gulf states gain specialists with more real-world Shahed experience than almost anyone else on earth.

That matters because Ukraine has intercepted thousands of Shahed-136 and Shahed-238 drones since 2022 and has developed real-time methods for detection, jamming, tracking, and layered interception.

The Gulf may have the hardware, but Ukraine has the experience.

Iran supplied these drones to Russia. Ukraine learned how to destroy them. Now it is passing that knowledge to countries facing the same threat.

Two hundred and one experts. Active-duty military. Gulf-requested. Shahed-specific. And once again, Ukraine moved faster than Washington.

 

In a striking and controversial remark, Netanyahu draws a stark comparison between morality and power, suggesting that in the real world, strength often outweighs ideals.

He implies that figures associated with peace and compassion hold little advantage if they lack the power to enforce their values. In contrast, history, he argues, has often favored those who were ruthless, strategic, and overwhelmingly strong—regardless of moral standing.

The statement reflects a hardline perspective: that global outcomes are not always shaped by what is right, but by who holds the most القوة, influence, and control. It paints a grim picture of a world where good intentions alone are not enough to prevail.

Such a viewpoint is likely to spark intense debate, as it challenges the belief that justice and morality ultimately triumph over aggression and dominance.

At its core, the message raises an uncomfortable question—does power define truth in today’s world?