Tuesday, July 14, 2026


 
BREAKING: HELL YES! Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan terrifies her MAGA "co-workers" by boldly calling for a binding ethics panel to finally hold the court accountable — while Amy Coney Barrett was sitting right beside her.
Thomas and Alito just started sweating bullets...
“I think that we would be better off with an enforcement mechanism, and I think, you know, that’s not to say I think that my colleagues aren’t taking this code incredibly seriously,” Kagan said while testifying before Congress.
“We’re all, you know, making every effort, and I think successful efforts to live by it. But if nothing else, for public confidence, right?” she added. “An enforcement mechanism can also make clear that not every accusation, every charge, has anything to it.”
This is a firm but overly diplomatic assessment from Kagan. The liberal justices certainly take the code of conduct seriously — as evinced by the fact that none of them have been caught in corruption scandals — but the conservative justices aren't nearly as committed to ethical behavior.
Both Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have been caught accepting in-kind bribes from powerful Republican billionaires in the form of luxury travel, gifts, and expensive vacations. They're living like sultans, destroying any semblance of propriety and undermining the legitimacy of the court in the process. Just based on what we know already, both of them should have been impeached and removed long ago.
"You know, on the Code of Conduct, as you noted, we, the nine justices all agreed to a Code of Conduct," Kagan said. "It's specifically geared towards the Supreme Court. As you also noted, there is a question about enforceability..."
"And right now, the mechanism has no enforceability system," she explained. "And this is something on which various people have spoken in the past. And, you know, I've made my views known in the past, which is that I think we should work hard to try to figure out some enforcement system."
"I will say that that's an extremely difficult question for a pretty obvious reason, I think, which is that I don't think that you would want an enforcement system that was controlled by the executive branch or by the legislature," Kagan went on.
"And this is because of what you said in your opening statement about the importance of judicial independence," she said. "You know, you don't want a president picking an inspector general to decide, you know, which of us is breaking the rules or how we're breaking the rules."
This is an astute point from Kagan. While we absolutely need an ethics panel to keep watch over the court, it cannot be controlled by the White House. Imagine if Trump had an ethics attack dog that he could sic on the liberal justices to lay the groundwork for impeaching them on fabricated charges. He has already displayed a horrifying willingness to politicize the Justice Department and FBI for partisan purposes. We simply cannot trust him or future Republican Presidents with direct, enforceable oversight over the Supreme Court.
"So, I think it really has to come from within the judiciary," Kagan continued. "And that's hard because, you know, we sit at the top of the Judiciary Committee. So, it's hard to figure out how to have a system that makes use of judicial resources to police us."
"One idea that has been suggested by some people is to use respected retired judges. That has, you know, some pros, some cons. I think that this remains an open question, a question of discussion," she said.
Meanwhile, conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett was sitting beside Kagan during the hearing. She was visibly uncomfortable with the line of questioning, presumably because she didn't want to throw her idealogical compatriots under the bus, and so she stated that she's "not quite sure" and "less certain" about Kagan's suggestions.
What do you think the best course of actions is?
Please like and share if you support an independent ethics panel!
See less

 
BREAKING: OUCH! Progressive star Jennifer Welch unleashes a BLISTERING takedown of the late Lindsey Graham, says he only cared about "dressing up in red panties" and "kissing the ass of Israel."
This is a nuclear bomb on his sordid legacy...
"Lindsey doesn't give a flying f*ck about you because he could give two shits about the people of South Carolina," Welch said on her podcast after playing a clip of Lindsey's sister Darlene insisting that her brother cared about her and the state he represented.
"He hasn't done anything to help the state of South Carolina," continued Welch. "His number one priority, as we know, is hiring sex workers, dressing up in red panties, and having them do all sorts of crazy ass shit to him."
Allegations that he was a closeted gay man have long dogged Graham and several sex workers have come forward to claim that he employed their services frequently. Meanwhile, he was a leading figure in the deeply anti-LGBTQ MAGA movement, making him a hypocrite of the worst sort.
"Number two, kissing the ass of Israel," continued Welch. "Number three, being a homicidal, genocidal warmonger. And number four, kissing the ass of Donald Trump. Never, ever, ever has this man fought for South Carolinians."
Graham could best be described as an "Israel First" politician. He privileged that foreign nation's interests over America's at every turn, sending countless billions of dollars to prop up their military as they wage wars of genocidal intent and territorial expansion. Graham was so pro-Israel that many commentators have even suggested that he was blackmailed — perhaps with material pertaining to his private sexual proclivities.
"So at this stage in fascism, sure, f*ck it. Senator Darlene, let's do it. Why not? Does it matter at this point?" added Welch, referring to the fact that Graham's sister has been chosen by the Republican governor, at Trump's urging, to fill the vacant Senate seat for the remainder of Graham's term.
And Welch wasn't done there.
"This is a moment for the Democrats to wholly start attacking, you might say, 'Attack after Lindsey Graham's death?'" she said. "This is the fight of our lives! Yes, you say, here's a man who every single day preached family values and anti-gay rhetoric and talked about the killing of civilians, was a homicidal war criminal out the wazoo."
"And now we know, as we've known for a long time, that he likes to put on red panties and kink around with sex workers," she continued. "Which, listen, I don't give a shit. I'm not some Christian prude that wants to be involved in the sex lives of everybody else."
"But the Katie Millers, the Stephen Millers, the Lindsey Grahams, and all of these people are that. And we need to start calling out the hypocrisy," she added.
Do you agree with Welch?
Should we bite our tongues or should we speak the truth about Graham?
Please like and share if you think that Lindsey Graham was a monster!
See less

BREAKING: Marco Rubio vows to DISMANTLE the International Criminal Court that prosecutes genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
In a move that reflects the Trump administration's deep fears over accountability for their actions, Marco Rubio just declared war on international justice itself.
The Secretary of State announced Monday that the Trump administration is launching a full diplomatic campaign to destroy the International Criminal Court — the global tribunal established in 2002 to prosecute genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Not reform it. Not push back on specific rulings. Dismantle it entirely.
"We will dismantle the ICC — brick by brick, if necessary," Rubio wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, framing it as a battle of "sovereign states over globalism."
Let's be clear about what's actually happening here. This isn't abstract ideology. This comes weeks after three ICC judges sued the Trump administration over sanctions the administration illegally imposed on them — sanctions levied because the court dared to investigate American allies, including Israel's conduct against Palestinians.
Rubio's rhetoric reads less like foreign policy and more like a conspiracy theory. He called the court "a global tribunal staffed by unelected globalist bureaucrats," and accused it of being "backed and run by a powerful network of leftist nongovernment organizations, smug globalists, and hostile Third World governments united by their enmity toward the U.S."
That's not diplomacy. That's a culture-war rant aimed at an institution that 125 nations have ratified to hold war criminals accountable — including Vladimir Putin, who the ICC, with the Biden administration's cooperation, indicted for kidnapping Ukrainian children.
And that's the real story here. When the ICC pursued Putin for stealing children, the U.S. shared intelligence. When it started looking at Israel and at U.S. conduct in Afghanistan, suddenly the whole institution became an illegitimate "globalist" scheme that must be destroyed "brick by brick."
The State Department is now weaponizing travel bans, visa revocations, and sanctions — not against war criminals, but against the judges trying to hold them accountable.
This isn't protecting American sovereignty. It's protecting impunity — for Trump's allies, and potentially for war criminals everywhere.
Please like and share to spread the news!
BREAKING: Marco Rubio vows to DISMANTLE the International Criminal Court that prosecutes genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

 

“Cattle die, kinsmen die, and you yourself will die.
But one thing never dies: the reputation of the one who has died.” ~Hávamál
Ah, yes. The part everyone likes to skip—the ending where you don’t get to edit the story anymore.
Death is not a sanctifier. It’s a seal. A wax stamp pressed onto the record you already wrote. No revisions. No clever spin. No last-minute absolution whispered over a cooling body. Just the sum of your choices, sitting there like a ledger that refuses to burn.
And yet—watch how quickly the living these days scramble to rewrite it.
“Don’t speak ill of the dead,” they say, clutching pearls with one hand and scrubbing history with the other. As if silence is virtue. As if truth becomes cruelty the moment a heart stops beating. No, darling—that’s not morality. That’s narrative control. That’s fear of what the story actually says when you stop decorating it.
The *Hávamál* doesn’t play that game. It doesn’t care about your comfort. It cares about what remains.
Reputation.
Not reputation as in branding—no, not your polished speeches or your curated persona—but the real thing. The trail you carved through the world. The fractures. The fires. The fingerprints you left on other people’s lives and on the bones of the society you helped shape.
So let’s not pretend we don’t know what we’re looking at.
Charlie Kirk didn’t build anything resembling unity. He built a machine that fed on division and called it purpose. He understood the marketplace well: outrage sells, resentment scales, and if you wrap it all in the language of God, you get a shield thick enough to deflect accountability. Call him a martyr if you like—but understand what you’re really doing. You’re not honoring a life. You’re laundering it. You’re turning conflict into sainthood and hoping no one notices the blood under the robes.
And Lindsey Graham?
Oh, this one is almost too perfect—a case study in real-time moral collapse.
January 6th, 2021. You remember it. Don’t pretend you don’t. The Capitol breached. Windows shattered. Lawmakers running. A mob, fed and aimed, crashing into the spine of American democracy while the world watched.
And there he was—Lindsey Graham—standing in the aftermath, just long enough to taste the truth. Just long enough to recognize the line that had been crossed. For a flicker of a moment, there it was: clarity. "All I can say is count me out. Enough is enough." " President Trump has tarnished his presidency, —his actions were the problem."
And then—gone.
Because clarity is inconvenient when power is still on the table.
So he chose. Not once. Not reluctantly. Repeatedly. Publicly. Shamelessly.
He chose to abandon his sworn oath. Chose to defend what he had just witnessed. Chose to align himself with the very force that tried to rip the rule of law out by its roots. A full-circle performance so complete it would be impressive if it weren’t so corrosive. A 360-degree spin straight into complicity.
Call it loyalty if you need the comfort.
I’ll call it what it is: surrender dressed up as strategy. Betrayal with a handshake. A senator who saw the fire—and decided to warm his hands at it.
That is the reputation that survives him. Not the speeches. Not the eulogies. That moment. That choice. That pivot away from truth and into power.
And now—here come the mourners. The speechwriters. The myth-makers. Polishing. Softening. Recasting. Wrapping it all in language so gentle you’d almost believe nothing sharp ever happened.
But I am not gentle.
The dead don’t need your lies. The living do.
Because this isn’t about honoring them—it’s about protecting what they built. A political ecosystem that thrives on distortion. Where faith becomes a weapon, patriotism becomes a costume, and truth becomes… negotiable. Where martyrs are manufactured and patriots are declared by loyalty rather than by law.
Watch closely: the eulogies aren’t for the dead. They’re for the movement. They’re sermons in a church that cannot afford to admit what it has done.
And you are expected to sit quietly in the pews.
No.
I don’t celebrate death. Not violence. Not loss. Not the end of a human life. That’s not the game here.
But I refuse—absolutely refuse—to participate in the lie that death redeems a legacy.
It doesn’t.
It reveals it.
Both of these men made choices that sharpened division, normalized fear, and encouraged a nation to see itself not as a community, but as a battlefield. They helped build a culture where truth bends, where enemies are manufactured, and where loyalty to a man outweighs loyalty to the laws that hold a country together.
That is the structure they leave behind.
That is the inheritance.
And here’s the part no one likes to say out loud: silence helps it stand.
Every softened word. Every omitted truth. Every “now isn’t the time” becomes another brick in the myth.
But the *Hávamál* doesn’t wait for a convenient time.
It tells you plainly: your name is what survives you.
So the question was never how they died.
The question is what their names now carry.
Some names become guides.
Others become warnings.
And death—no matter how dressed up, no matter how reverently spoken of—does not get to choose which one you are.
You already did that.
Long before the final breath.
See less

 

 
The World Health Organization, together with French President Emmanuel Macron, has issued a joint statement urging governments to impose stricter controls on digital platforms.
The move, presented as a way to protect children’s health, centers on mandatory age verification systems and redesigned platform features.
 
According to the statement, digital environments including social media, gaming, and AI tools require “effective governance, age-appropriate design, and stronger safeguards.”
Officials highlight risks such as anxiety, sleep disruption, harmful content exposure, and data profiling, arguing that current designs are not neutral and demand intervention.
 
The practical outcome of these age-assurance requirements would be widespread identity checks (using government IDs, facial scans, or linked databases) to restrict access.
This infrastructure would apply across major platforms, effectively requiring verification for most users rather than minors alone.
 
Similar efforts are already advancing in countries like Australia, the UK, and Canada, where laws targeting under-16 access are raising concerns about broader adult identification mandates.
The proposal positions digital spaces as key determinants of public health, opening the door to ongoing regulation of content, algorithms, and user participation under international health guidelines.
Privacy advocates warn that linking real-world identities to online activity at this scale could limit anonymous expression and expand tracking capabilities, even as the statement acknowledges data collection risks.
 
This development signals a major shift toward controlled digital access under the guise of child protection.
Observers will be watching how governments translate these recommendations into policy and what it means for open internet use going forward.
 
As George Orwell wrote in 1984: “Big Brother is watching you.”
In the novel, that constant surveillance was framed as necessary protection for society…
The parallels are impossible to ignore.

Building a stockpile doesn't require a spare room, a chest freezer, or a few hundred dollars dropped in one trip to a prepper supply store. Most of the food that actually keeps you fed longest is already sitting on the cheapest shelf at the grocery store it's just rarely the food people reach for first.

The trick to stockpiling on a tight budget isn't finding rare survival food. It's picking ordinary staples that are dirt cheap per calorie, don't need refrigeration, and hold up for years if you store them right. Here are 18 that do exactly that, starting with the ones that stretch a dollar the least and working up to the staples that should anchor your whole pantry.

18. Instant ramen (the plain blocks, not the cup versions)

A brick of plain instant noodles costs pennies and packs in enough carbs and sodium to get someone through a rough day. Skip the styrofoam cup versions — you're paying extra for packaging you don't need, and the blocks stack far more efficiently in a bin.

They're not nutritionally complete on their own, so pair them with a source of protein and something green if you can. Still, calorie-for-dollar, almost nothing beats them for pure emergency filler.

17. Powdered milk

A box of powdered milk turns into gallons of usable milk for a fraction of what jugs cost at the store, and unlike fresh milk it can sit in a cabinet for a year or more without spoiling.

It's not going to taste like the carton in your fridge, but it works fine in coffee, oatmeal, and baking, which covers most of what people actually use milk for day to day.

👉 A vacuum-sealed storage container keeps powdered milk from clumping once opened — worth grabbing if you're buying the big box size, since the built-in scoop and pour spout save a lot of mess.

16. Peanut butter

Peanut butter is one of the few budget staples that's both shelf-stable and genuinely calorie-dense, which matters a lot when you're trying to feed people on limited supplies. The natural, no-stir kind separates and needs more attention, so for long storage the regular shelf-stable version is the more practical choice.

A jar left unopened in a cool cupboard will comfortably outlast its printed date by a year or more.

15. Dried lentils

Lentils are one of the cheapest sources of protein per pound you can buy, and they cook faster than almost any other dried legume, which matters if fuel or time is limited. Store them in a sealed container away from light and they'll stay good for well over a decade.

14. Store-brand canned vegetables

Name-brand canned corn and green beans cost more for the same can, same shelf life, same nutrition. Buying the store brand instead of the name brand is one of the easiest ways to stretch a stockpiling budget without giving up anything.

Rotate older cans to the front of the shelf and buy a few extra every grocery trip instead of one large haul — it spreads the cost out and keeps your stock fresh.

13. White rice

Rice is the backbone of a lot of budget stockpiles for good reason: it's cheap in bulk, keeps for decades when sealed properly, and works as a base for almost any meal you build around it.

👉 Food-grade buckets with gasket lids are the standard way preppers store bulk rice and beans, since they keep out moisture and pests far better than the bag it came in.

12. Pinto and black beans

Dried beans bought in bulk cost a fraction of the canned version per serving, and while they take longer to cook, that trade-off saves real money over time. Beans and rice together form a surprisingly complete protein source, which is part of why the combination shows up in so many low-budget diets around the world.

11. Rolled oats

A large bag of plain rolled oats is one of the cheapest breakfasts available, and it stores well for a couple of years in a sealed container. Buying the plain bulk bag instead of individual flavored packets cuts the cost per serving dramatically — you can always add your own sweetener or dried fruit.

10. Table salt

Salt costs almost nothing and never really goes bad, but its value goes well past seasoning food. It's useful for preserving meat, making brine, and basic first aid, so a few extra bags are worth keeping even though they take up almost no space.

9. Granulated sugar

Sugar is inexpensive, stores indefinitely if kept dry, and works for cooking, baking, and even simple preservation methods like jam-making. It's one of the few pantry items where buying in bulk is almost pure savings, since it doesn't spoil while you use it down.

8. Bouillon cubes or powder

A small box of bouillon turns plain water and rice into something that actually resembles a meal, which matters more than people expect when the food on hand is limited and repetitive. It's cheap, it's light, and a little goes a long way.

7. Canned tuna or chicken

Canned meat costs more per pound than dried staples, but it's the easiest way to add real protein to a meal without any prep. Buying it on sale and rotating stock keeps the cost manageable, and a case tucked in the back of a closet barely takes up any room.

6. Pasta

Plain dried pasta is inexpensive, cooks quickly, and lasts for years in a sealed container. Buying the generic store brand instead of name brands can cut the price nearly in half with no real difference in how it holds up in storage.

5. Cooking oil

A bottle of vegetable or canola oil is cheap and essential for actually making shelf-stable staples like rice and beans taste like food. It has a shorter shelf life than most of this list, so buy a reasonable amount and rotate it rather than stockpiling years' worth at once.

4. Multivitamins

They're not food, but a bottle of basic multivitamins is a cheap insurance policy against the nutritional gaps that come from eating a lot of rice, beans, and pasta for an extended stretch. A single bottle costs less than a few restaurant meals and lasts a long time in a cool, dry spot.

Vitamins only go so far, though. A while back I went through a stretch where an actual pharmacy run just wasn't in the budget, and a bottle of vitamins wasn't going to do much for the stomach bug and the sleepless nights that came with it. I ended up piecing together some old remedies using stuff that was already sitting in my kitchen.

I found the whole thing laid out here, and it's the reason I haven't had to make an emergency pharmacy trip since.

👉 A simple over-the-door or stackable pantry organizer makes it much easier to actually track what you have and what's about to expire, which matters more on a budget stockpile than a large one — you can't afford to let anything go to waste.

3. Honey

Honey costs more upfront than sugar, but it never truly spoils, works as a natural preservative in some recipes, and has minor first-aid uses on top of being food. A single jar tucked away is a small splurge that pays off over a very long time.

2. Bulk flour

Flour is inexpensive per pound and the foundation for bread, tortillas, and thickeners for soups and gravies. It has more natural oil than something like white rice, so it doesn't last quite as long, but a well-sealed bag stored in a cool spot will comfortably last a year or more.

👉 A kitchen scale is worth the small cost here — portioning flour, rice, and beans by weight instead of guessing keeps a tight budget from quietly turning into wasted food.

1. Water storage containers

None of the food above matters much without water to cook and rehydrate it. Stackable, food-grade water containers are one of the few things on this list worth buying new rather than improvising with old bottles, since food-grade plastic won't leach chemicals into stored water over time.

👉 Stackable food-grade water storage containers are inexpensive relative to almost everything else on this list, and they're the one item that has no substitute if the tap stops working.


Small Budget, Real Stockpile

None of these 18 items require a big-box membership or a specialty prepper retailer. They're sitting in the regular aisles of any grocery store, and most of them cost less per serving than the convenience foods people already buy without thinking twice.

The real strategy behind stockpiling on a tight budget isn't a single big shopping trip — it's buying a little extra of these staples every time you're already at the store, rotating what you have, and letting the pantry build itself over a few months instead of a few hundred dollars all at once.