%20Facebook.png)
Saturday, May 2, 2026
Mortgage Elimination
The few who understand the system will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependent on it's favors that there will be no opposition from that class." -- Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
One process of Mortgage Elimination has provided a highly confidential administrative procedure that had been 100% effective for several years. A non-confrontational way to insure there's no litigation, over 400 homeowners obtained clear title.
However, in the past year or so, the banks reneged on their agreement to reconvey the deed after the debt was discharged. New procedures are needed to complete this administrative remedy.
The information below is useful to understand the extent of the banking fraud. Now we are using the consumer protection laws to stop the extraordinary predation of the banks and other lending institutions.
Topmost of these laws is the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) of 1968, revised in 1980, 1995, and 2000. Also useful to our quest for fairness and justice under the law is the Real Estate Settlement Practices Act (RESPA), the Homeowners Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), the Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA), State and Federal Usury Laws, and others.
The complexity of these laws has generally made them inaccessible to all but the most persistent and those who can hire attorneys to represent them. We have found a middle ground in which our paralegals audit and analyze your mortgage or deed of trust for violations, produce the documents that connect these violations to the statutes and case law, and guide your through the administrative stage. More than half of the cases are settled without the necessity of litigation. But we have attorneys all around the USA ready to represent you in court on a contingency basis should that be necessary.
How serious is it? Nearly EVERY mortgage or deed of trust has 25-35 violations of the statutes and regulations. The best we have seen was only 9 violations. Usually half of these violations are "title issue" which mean that they are so serious that such violations can lead to the lender being forced to give up security interest in the property....your home free and clear of debt. In addition each violation can result in fines against the lender up to $2000 each. You do the math. Banks COULD lose their banking charter over this and, after all, what bank would be dumb enough to want to take their own fraud into court with someone who knows their secrets and how to deal with them?
Nevertheless, this consumer protection process only addresses the SUPER-greediness of the lenders. There is still an underlying fraud you should be aware of as well. The "lending" techniques that are used are beyond brilliant. It took some very, very smart people to figure out how to appear to be lending money, but in actuality have the value supplied by the person applying for a loan. And that is what is happening.
If you're an honest, ethical person who believes that the party who funds a loan should be repaid, then we can help you. When you discover the truth, you will be happy to be repaid for funding your own loan and wonder why the bankers thought they should be paid.
It's only fair to receive equal protection under the law, equal protection under the bank loan agreement, and for the whole truth about the bank loan agreement to be revealed. The whole truth is NOT revealed to the borrower. The bank or other lending institution does NOT disclose to you that your promissory note is actually an asset to the bank - which they deposit as THEIR asset.
The bank does not let you know that a promissory note is actually a "negotiable instrument" under the Uniform Commercial Code, and that it will be deposited to fund your loan. Nor did they tell you that the bank has a liability to you of approximately the amount of the loan. (The bank owes you by their own bookkeeping entries!)
The bank does NOT tell you that you actually provided the real cash value for your own loan! Thus, the bank only appears to be lending you anything.
"The Federal Reserve Banks create money out of thin air to buy Government bonds... The Federal Reserve Bank is a total money making machine." Representative Wright Patman, former Chairman of a House Banking Committee
That's right: banks and lending institutions only appear to lend money. Let's take a quick look at how money is created at the "government" level, then we'll see how this applies to you and your alleged debt.
But is it money? Where did the Federal Reserve get the money to exchange for the government bonds? It made a bookkeeping entry. That's it! Money is created by the banks out of thin air! Our government gave them that power when it created the Federal Reserve System.
The Federal Reserve creates money out of nothing; this is usury, the payment of interest on pretended loans; the true cause of the hidden tax called inflation; the way in which the Fed creates boom-bust cycles. This technique was developed by political and monetary wizards to create money out of nothing for the purpose of lending. This is not an entirely accurate description because it implies that money is created first and then waits for someone to borrow it.
On the other hand, textbooks on banking often state that money is created out of debt. This also is misleading because it implies that debt exists first and then is converted into money. In truth, money is not created until the instant it is borrowed. It is the act of borrowing which causes it to spring into existence. And, incidentally, it is the act of paying off the debt that causes it to vanish. There is no short phrase that perfectly describes that process. So, until one is invented along the way, we shall continue using the phrase "create money out of nothing" and occasionally add "for the purpose of lending" where necessary to further clarify the meaning.
So, let us now...see just how far this money/debt-creation process has been carried -- and how it works.
The first fact that needs to be considered is that our money today has no gold or silver behind it whatsoever. The fraction is not 54% nor 15%. It is 0%. It has traveled the path of all previous fractional money in history and already has degenerated into pure fiat money. The fact that most of it is in the form of checkbook balances rather than paper currency is a mere technicality; and the fact that bankers speak about "reserve ratios" is eyewash. The so-called reserves to which they refer are, in fact, Treasury bonds and other certificates of debt.
Former Congressman Louis McFadden, chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency remarked about the Federal Reserve Bank:
"A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure."
Debt elimination through knowledge of the statutes is an essential part of real freedom.
These documents are NOT secret! They ARE a matter of Public Record.
𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗛𝗙𝗨𝗟 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗦 𝗠𝗢𝗦𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗗𝗢 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪, .... 𝗕𝗨𝗧 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗟𝗗…
1. The IRS 𝗶͟𝘀͟ ͟𝗡͟𝗼͟𝘁͟ a US government agency. It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)
2. The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N. (Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816)
3. The United States 𝗵͟𝗮͟𝘀͟ ͟𝗡͟𝗢͟𝗧͟ had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654)
4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887)
5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803)
6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs w̲e̲r̲e̲ ̲𝗻̲𝗲̲𝘃̲𝗲̲𝗿̲ part of the U.S. government, even though the “U.S. Government” held stock in the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms and not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are “Department of the Treasury”. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))
8. There are 𝗡͟𝗢͟ ͟𝗝͟𝘂͟𝗱͟𝗶͟𝗰͟𝗶͟𝗮͟𝗹͟ ͟𝗖͟𝗼͟𝘂͟𝗿͟𝘁͟𝘀͟ in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)
9. There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178)
10. According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number. (House Report (103-826)
11. New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capital of the World.” For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )
12. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)
13. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says “U.S. Department of Treasury” at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)
14.𝗬̲𝗼̲𝘂̲ ̲𝗼̲𝘄̲𝗻̲ ̲𝗡̲𝗢̲ ̲𝗽̲𝗿̲𝗼̲𝗽̲𝗲̲𝗿̲𝘁̲𝘆̲!̲!̲!̲ Slaves can’t own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
15. The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but rather the S̲u̲p̲r̲e̲m̲e̲ ̲C̲o̲u̲r̲t̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲P̲e̲n̲n̲s̲y̲l̲v̲a̲n̲i̲a̲. (42 PA. C.S.A. 502)
16. The King of England f̲i̲n̲a̲n̲c̲i̲a̲l̲l̲y̲ ̲b̲a̲c̲k̲e̲d̲ ̲b̲o̲t̲h̲ ̲s̲i̲d̲e̲s̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲t̲h̲e̲ ̲A̲m̲e̲r̲i̲c̲a̲n̲ ̲R̲e̲v̲o̲l̲u̲t̲i̲o̲n̲a̲r̲y̲ ̲W̲a̲r̲.̲.̲ (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
17. You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it! The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et al) and N̲O̲T̲ ̲t̲o̲ ̲t̲h̲e̲ ̲p̲e̲o̲p̲l̲e̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲t̲h̲e̲ ̲s̲o̲v̲e̲r̲e̲i̲g̲n̲ ̲R̲e̲p̲u̲b̲l̲i̲c̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲t̲h̲e̲ ̲u̲n̲i̲t̲e̲d̲ ̲S̲t̲a̲t̲e̲s̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲A̲m̲e̲r̲i̲c̲a̲.̲ (Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
18. America is a British Colony. The United States
𝗶̲𝘀̲ ̲𝗮̲ ̲𝗰̲𝗼̲𝗿̲𝗽̲𝗼̲𝗿̲𝗮̲𝘁̲𝗶̲𝗼̲𝗻̲ not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796 (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)
20. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
21. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)
22. 𝗔̲ ̲𝟭̲𝟬̲𝟰̲𝟬̲ ̲𝗙̲𝗼̲𝗿̲𝗺̲ ̲𝗶̲𝘀̲ ̲𝗳̲𝗼̲𝗿̲ ̲𝘁̲𝗿̲𝗶̲𝗯̲𝘂̲𝘁̲𝗲̲ ̲𝗽̲𝗮̲𝗶̲𝗱̲ ̲𝘁̲𝗼̲ ̲𝗕̲𝗿̲𝗶̲𝘁̲𝗮̲𝗶̲𝗻̲ (IRS Publication 6209)
23. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)
24. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)
25. The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)
26. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children. (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
27. Military dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) in to Districts (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate)
28. “The People” does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)
29. It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)
30. Every thing in the “United States” is up for sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc… Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake?? (Executive Order 12803)
31. “𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹” (Executive Order 13037) 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗼𝗳 𝘁̲𝗵̲𝗲̲ ̲𝘂̲𝘀̲𝗲̲ ̲𝗼̲𝗳̲ ̲𝘆̲𝗼̲𝘂̲𝗿̲ ̲𝘀̲𝗶̲𝗴̲𝗻̲𝗮̲𝘁̲𝘂̲𝗿̲𝗲̲𝘀̲ ̲𝗼̲𝗻̲ ̲𝗺̲𝗼̲𝗿̲𝘁̲𝗴̲𝗮̲𝗴̲𝗲̲𝘀̲,̲ ̲𝗰̲𝗮̲𝗿̲ ̲𝗹̲𝗼̲𝗮̲𝗻̲𝘀̲,̲ ̲𝗰̲𝗿̲𝗲̲𝗱̲𝗶̲𝘁̲ ̲𝗰̲𝗮̲𝗿̲𝗱̲𝘀̲,̲ ̲𝘆̲𝗼̲𝘂̲𝗿̲ ̲𝘀̲𝗼̲𝗰̲𝗶̲𝗮̲𝗹̲ ̲𝘀̲𝗲̲𝗰̲𝘂̲𝗿̲𝗶̲𝘁̲𝘆̲ ̲𝗻̲𝘂̲𝗺̲𝗯̲𝗲̲𝗿̲,̲ ̲𝗲̲𝘁̲𝗰̲.̲
32. The U.N. – United Nations – has financed the operations of the United States government (the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every man, woman and child in America.
The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.
The good news is we don’t have to fulfill “our” 𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another’s fictitious obligation.
BREAKING: Disgusting and unforgivable! Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton just let a convicted child predator off with a pathetic slap on the wrist — reducing a life-without-parole sentence for years of sexually abusing a little boy down to just 60 days in jail.
This is the rotten, two-tiered “justice” the Texas GOP machine delivers when one of their own gets caught.
Waco lawyer Adam Hoffman preyed on a third-grade boy for more than three years. He should have rotted in prison for the rest of his miserable life. But because he’s connected to the right people, Paxton’s office swooped in and cut a sweetheart deal, downgrading horrific felonies to misdemeanors and sending this monster back to the streets after barely two months.
The victim’s mother spoke with raw courage and heartbreak:
“This has been a long and painful journey… My baby was in the third grade when this monster started abusing him. Six and a half of his 14 years have been spent in counseling. I watched my little boy be so brave — he’s more of a man than you will ever be. He is my hero.”
This is what the self-proclaimed “party of family values” actually does in practice: protect sexual predators and their powerful friends while leaving innocent children and their families to suffer.
We Republicans Against Trump are done pretending this is normal. This is moral rot. This is corruption wearing a red tie. This is the same disgusting pattern we see from the top down — whether it’s shielding abusers in Congress, defending a twice-nominated serial sexual assault defendant, or now cutting sweetheart deals for pedophiles with the right political connections.
Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott aren’t protecting Texas families.
They’re protecting the predators in their own circle.
Enough. Real conservatives believe in law and order and protecting the innocent — not running a protection racket for monsters.
It’s time to throw these hypocrites out. Vote Ken Paxton, Greg Abbott, Donald Trump, and every single Republican who enables this filth out of office. Texas — and America — deserves better than this sickening betrayal.
Scientists and engineers with highly specific technical knowledge sets are vanishing. No announcements. No farewell emails. No professional transitions. They are simply gone, and the manner in which they disappear suggests someone is moving fast.
The theory gaining serious traction is that this is not random. Every major nation on Earth may be running the same classified program simultaneously, and it is bigger than anything that has ever existed.
The pattern spans multiple countries. Specialists in narrow, highly technical fields tied to a single area of knowledge are being pulled from their normal lives with unusual urgency. No press releases. No LinkedIn updates. No explanations offered to colleagues or family. Researchers who track this pattern describe it as a quiet global sweep, systematic and deliberate, with a speed that suggests external pressure rather than bureaucratic planning.
The technology angle is where the theory becomes extraordinary. Rumor in certain well-connected circles holds that major world governments have been given exotic non-human technology. Not discovered. Not reverse-engineered from crash debris. Given. And the race now is to understand it, exploit it, and turn it into an advantage before someone else does first.
The urgency is the tell. Normal classified programs take years to staff. They recruit through channels, they negotiate, they plan. What is being described here looks nothing like that. It looks like a draft. An emergency mobilization of scientific talent into underground facilities running on a timeline nobody is publicly acknowledging. Either an adversary nation has cracked something critical and a new clock started ticking, or something is approaching from outside and governments worldwide have known about it long enough to prepare but not long enough to be relaxed about it.
No government has commented. No official body has acknowledged any pattern of scientist disappearances. The silence itself is notable, because if this were a conspiracy theory with no basis, it would typically attract a denial. Instead there is nothing.
Some researchers believe this is the opening phase of a super-classified Manhattan Project on a global scale, triggered by non-human technology and a deadline the public has not been told about. Others argue the disappearances have mundane explanations including routine security reassignments and that the pattern is being inflated by people who want it to mean something extraordinary.
If governments worldwide were handed exotic technology and told a clock was running, would they tell the public? Or would they draft every mind they needed and go underground without a word?
Thursday, April 30, 2026
The Deal We Made With Reagan
And What It Cost Us
White Rose | April 30, 2026
There was a deal made in America. Not written down, not signed, but widely understood. If you gave the people at the top more freedom, more capital, and more room to operate, they would build, invest, and create prosperity that flowed outward. That was the promise.
For a long time before that deal, we ran a different system. From the 1940s through the 1960s, under leaders like Dwight D. Eisenhower, the United States operated with top marginal tax rates above 90 percent. In practice, far fewer paid anything close to that because the code was full of deductions. Those deductions were not random. They were designed to reward building. Expand your workforce, invest in equipment, fund research, and your tax burden dropped. It created a simple logic: reinvest or lose it.
The result was not perfect, but it was powerful. Wages rose with productivity, infrastructure expanded, homeownership surged, and the middle class became the center of the economy rather than an afterthought. There is a counterargument worth taking seriously here. The United States, after World War II, faced limited global competition while Europe and Japan rebuilt. That advantage was real. What matters is what we did with it. We could have concentrated that wealth. We did not. Policy choices turned dominance into shared prosperity rather than private stockpiles.
Then came Ronald Reagan, and the deal changed. Taxes at the top were cut dramatically, with the top marginal rate falling from 70 percent to 28 percent. Capital gains taxes were reduced, corporate taxes eased, and regulation loosened. The pitch was straightforward. Free up capital and it will find its way into productive investment.
For a while, it looked like it worked. Inflation dropped, growth returned, and the economy stabilized after the turbulence of the 1970s. If you freeze the frame in the mid-1980s, the argument holds. The problem is that policy is not judged in quarters. It is judged in decades, and the mechanics underneath began to shift.
Lower taxes on capital gains did more than increase after-tax income. They changed behavior. When returns on financial assets are taxed less than returns on labor or production, money moves away from factories and payroll and into markets. This is where the system pivots from production to financialization. It becomes more profitable to move money than to make things. Stock buybacks replace expansion, short-term share price replaces long-term capacity, and CEOs stop acting like builders and start acting like traders.
The result is what economists call the Great Decoupling. Productivity continued to rise while worker pay stopped keeping pace, weakening the link between effort and reward. At the same time, the velocity of money shifted. Money in the hands of the middle class moves through the real economy, circulating through local businesses and services. Money at the top behaves differently. It accumulates, sitting in financial instruments, derivatives, and offshore structures. It grows, but it does not circulate the same way, and the system slows where it matters most.
What followed was not a sudden collapse but a gradual redirection. Instead, you got a slow transfer of wealth upward. Not dramatic enough for people to riot, but relentless enough to hollow out the middle while asset holders watched everything inflate in their favor. Housing drifted out of reach, healthcare turned into a profit machine, and education became debt financed.
Healthcare is the clearest example of where this road leads. The United States now spends roughly twice what comparable nations spend per person, with worse outcomes and shorter lifespans. That is not inefficiency. That is structure. Programs like Medicare Advantage, backed by figures like Mehmet Oz, represent the final evolution of the deal. A public system is partially privatized, a middle layer is inserted, and that layer profits not by delivering care but by managing, limiting, and sometimes denying it. It is extraction, formalized.
Education followed the same path. The GI Bill treated citizens as an investment and returned multiples on every dollar spent. Today, students borrow into the system and carry that weight for decades. We replaced national investment with individual liability. Taxes complete the picture. Since the Reagan shift, repeated cuts at the top have coincided with rising federal debt. You cannot claim fiscal discipline while consistently reducing revenue from those most able to contribute.
This is not a story of collapse. It is a story of redirection. When top marginal rates are high, there is a structural push toward reinvestment. When they are low, there is a structural pull toward accumulation. One model builds a country. The other builds portfolios.
So when people say return to Eisenhower era tax rates, they are not talking about punishing success. They are talking about restoring balance. A high top marginal rate does not mean everyone pays it. It means there is a threshold where hoarding stops making sense and building starts again. Even the 1986 tax reform understood part of this. It lowered rates, but it also closed loopholes and broadened the base. Structure matters as much as rate.
Conservatives once understood this. Under Eisenhower, it was not called socialism. It was called stability. If you want fiscal responsibility, look at when the debt curve begins to bend, because it bends sharply after this shift. If you want strong families and homeownership, look at when they begin to slip, because that decline tracks the decoupling of wages from productivity. If you want patriotism, ask the harder question of whether a system that concentrates wealth while weakening its base is actually serving the country.
Reagan did not break the system. He changed the deal. The promise was that giving more to the top would lift everyone. What we got instead was something quieter and more enduring: a system that rewards extraction over building, accumulation over circulation, and portfolios over people.
Correcting that is not about going backward. It is about remembering what the deal was supposed to be.
International Public Notice: Change of Trusteeship 
The following letter has been sent to the U.S. Secretary of State and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury (1789) and lays out the basic claims for non-performance over a period of decades.
It also mandates liquidation of the trusteeship.
The bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES corporation is complete and the remaining assets have been distributed and are now under recoupment by the actual owners.
We are collecting our original documents from various places around the world prior to transferring them to our National Archives.
Prior to this each document has to be scanned into our computer databases as JPEG files, and those files have to be replicated and distributed.
In a relatively short period of time the Federation will take over the vacated government functions while the states finish their work and debate renegotiation of international treaties and restructuring of the federal government.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
April 27th 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)