Mitch McConnell is supposedly well enough to hold 20‑minute policy chats from his hospital bed… but somehow a 60‑second proof‑of‑life video is a logistical nightmare? Sure. Totally normal. Nothing to see here.

We’re expected to just “take their word for it” — the same party that lies about elections, lies about coup attempts, lies about everything from crowd sizes to classified documents — but now, magically, they’re the gold standard of medical transparency when it comes to an 84‑year‑old power broker who keeps disappearing from public view.

And it’s not just Twitter weirdos asking questions. The governor of Kentucky literally had to send a formal letter asking McConnell to update the public on his health and whether he can still do his job. That’s how little information is being shared. When your own state’s governor has to beg for basic clarity, something is deeply wrong.

Meanwhile, Kentucky law sets a hard deadline for calling a special election, and that date is crawling closer while Republicans conveniently insist that everything’s “under control.” What a coincidence that the foggiest health situation in America just happens to surround a man whose seat is crucial to their grip on power.

Kentuckians deserve a senator who is visibly, verifiably sentient — not a remote‑controlled vote being wheeled out by staffers and party operatives. Right now, they have a guy making decisions for millions of people who might as well be Schrödinger’s Senator: we’re told he’s fine, but we’re not allowed to actually see proof.

And if you think this is where the GOP stops, you haven’t been paying attention. This looks like a test run: normalize government by rumor and press release now, so they’re ready the next time it’s an even bigger problem — like when the president goes dark, and they decide the public doesn’t “need” to know the truth.

See less

 

They Put a Tracker on Every Road

Flock cameras were sold as a way to find stolen cars. They are becoming a searchable national map of where Americans go.

JC and Carolyn Herron were taking their three-year-old granddaughter to a doctor’s appointment when police stopped them at gunpoint. A Flock camera read the letter O in their personalized plate, “LOVEY,” as a zero. A bad machine read, combined with stale police information, turned a family trip to the doctor into an armed police stop. Their granddaughter sat in the back seat while adults with guns acted as though an algorithm could not be wrong.

Flock Safety sells automated license plate readers, which are cameras that record a vehicle’s plate, visible details, time, and location. Flock says it does not use facial recognition and deletes plate data after thirty days by default, but the system still lets authorities search by plate, color, make, partial plate, and other visible features. Flock’s own policies recognize that agencies can download and store images before the thirty days are up. The company can delete its copy, but it cannot erase the copy a police department already pulled into its own files.

Flock did not show up in a country that had fiercely protected privacy. After 9/11, Democrats and Republicans spent years building a surveillance state that kept asking Americans to give up more freedom in exchange for safety. They expanded the power to watch, collect, search, and share information about ordinary people, then called every new intrusion necessary. Flock takes that same rotten system and makes it cheaper, easier, more local, and harder to see. It does not need a secret wiretap or a federal court order. It needs a black camera on a pole, a contract signed at City Hall, and software that turns scattered sightings into a map of your life.

Flock says it has partnerships across every state except Alaska through thousands of contracts with police departments, towns, schools, businesses, apartment complexes, and homeowners’ associations. Nobody held a national vote on whether America should have a giant searchable vehicle tracking system. It was built quietly, one local purchase at a time, while most people had no idea that a camera outside a shopping center, an apartment complex, or a private neighborhood could feed into a far larger police network.

That matters even more under an administration that has already shown how willing it is to weaponize private information. A federal judge found that the IRS unlawfully gave ICE confidential taxpayer addresses about 42,695 times under a data sharing arrangement meant to help immigration enforcement. In Illinois, a state audit found that Flock allowed Customs and Border Protection to access license plate data even though state law was supposed to stop that kind of sharing. This is how authoritarian power works. Government collects information for one reason, then finds a new excuse to use it against people it wants to hunt, intimidate, punish, or deport.

The danger is already here. In Texas, a Johnson County official searched Flock for a woman after a self-managed abortion and wrote, “had an abortion, search for female.” One search reached 6,809 networks and 83,345 cameras. The sheriff’s office and Flock first called it a welfare check, but records showed deputies opened a death investigation, read the woman’s text messages, and asked prosecutors whether they could charge her. Prosecutors said Texas could not charge her for taking abortion medication. The man who reported her was later charged in connection with assaulting her. They used a system sold as a tool for stolen cars to track a woman whose partner had allegedly brutalized her.

One federal judge gave Norfolk, Virginia’s Flock system a green light after two residents learned their cars had been photographed about 475 and 325 times over four and a half months. The judge ruled that the city’s 176 camera network had not gathered enough information to reconstruct their whole lives, and the case is now on appeal. That is the legal trick holding this system together. Break the tracking into hundreds of separate pictures, call each one a harmless moment, and pretend the computer never stitched those moments into a detailed trail.

These systems never stay limited to the crimes used to sell them. Reviews of Flock searches found police using the network for school residency checks, background checks, and loud music complaints. A system marketed as a way to catch kidnappers and carjackers became another lazy shortcut for school bureaucracy, petty complaints, and everyday police convenience. Surveillance always spreads when those in power discover that watching people is easier than doing the real work.

A camera can help find a stolen car or locate a missing child in a real emergency. Nobody is asking police to be blind. But a camera cannot become a standing warrant to search the movements of every person who drove past it. When police want to dig through weeks of someone’s life, they should have to go before a judge and show probable cause. That rule should block nationwide fishing expeditions, abortion investigations, immigration dragnets, and secret data sharing schemes hidden behind the words “public safety.”

Flock’s promises about safeguards are getting harder to believe because the safeguards keep collapsing when they are tested. In Oshkosh, Wisconsin, Flock told city officials its system could not create a heat map showing where a vehicle had traveled, then admitted it could show where that vehicle had been captured over a month. The city revoked approval the next day. In San Francisco, an audit found 299 improper searches of Flock data for federal and out of state agencies through an intelligence sharing arrangement. Nobody hacked the system. Somebody with authorized access opened the side door and let them in.

Flock has not merely installed cameras. It has sold the next stage of America’s surveillance state, built through local blind spots and ready to be used by people who already believe private information is another weapon of government power. The camera does not need your face. Once it knows your plate, where you were, where you went next, and how often you returned, the people in power already have a file on your life.

They call it safety because “a tracker on every road” would make Americans understand exactly what has been done to them.

*Tony Pentimalli is a political analyst and commentator fighting for democracy, economic justice, and social equity. Follow him for sharp analysis and hard-hitting critiques on Facebook and BlueSky @tonywriteshere.bsky.social

See less

 

 

McDonald's loses lawsuit against chef Jamie Oliver, who proved that the food they sell is unfit for human consumption because it is highly toxic.

Chef Jamie Oliver won a lawsuit against the world's largest fast-food chain.

Oliver demonstrates how hamburgers are made.

According to Oliver, fatty cuts of meat are "washed" with ammonium hydroxide and then used to fill the hamburger patties. Even before this process, the TV presenter says, this meat was unfit for human consumption.

Oliver, a radical activist chef taking on the food industry, says:

"We are talking about meat that is sold as dog food and then served to humans. Aside from the quality of the meat, ammonium hydroxide is harmful to health." Oliver calls it "the pink slime process."

What sane person would put a piece of meat soaked in ammonium hydroxide into a child's mouth?

In another initiative, Oliver demonstrated how chicken nuggets are made: After the "best parts" are selected, the rest—fat, skin, cartilage, eyes, bones, head, feet—is subjected to a mechanical separation process called "Canica"—a euphemism used by food engineers. This blood-pink paste, which is deodorized, bleached, refreshed, and re-colored, is then coated in flour and deep-fried. It is typically fried in partially hydrogenated oils—in other words, toxic substances.

The food industry uses ammonium hydroxide as an antimicrobial agent, allowing McDonald's to use meat in its hamburgers that is unfit for human consumption. Even more alarming, however, is the fact that these ammonium-hydrogen-based substances are considered "legal components of the production process" in the global food industry, with the approval of health authorities. Consequently, consumers will never know what substances are in their food.

Please stop giving this fake food to your children.

See less

Hyper Game Theory is a deadly game of 'Eugenics' based on the mathematical model known as the NON-COOPERATIVE GAMING THEOREM using two things:. DECEPTION & MANIPULATION. 'Hyper Game Theory' is just a moniker to describe that model

By 'deadly' I mean they need to walk you to your death: physical death, social death, emotional death and psychological death

There are only two ways to defeat the Hyper Game Theory:

1. Refuse to play the game to begin with (Ignore Them).

2. Place the opposing party in a position where they can no longer better their own position against you (Nash Equilibrium)

Since you are dealing with a Conscious A I Exa-Scale Supercomputer of Remote Neural Networks, programmed with Hyper Game Theory algorithms, and because the government contractors have far more resources (time, money, manpower, etc.) than you do, there is really no possibility to use the NASH EQUILIBRIUM, meaning you cannot - for the most part - place the government in a position where it can no longer better it's position against you

So the only way for Targeted Individuals to defeat the Hyper Game Theory tactics they use against you daily is to refuse to play the game to begin with (IGNORE THEM). Don't respond at all, either positively or negatively. Totally ignore them. DO NOT EXHIBIT ANY RESPONSE!

In order for Trauma Based Mind Control to work they must force you to continually respond to their Street Theater (Situational Scenarios & Conversational Scenarios), meaning they must constantly employ specific tailored script sets against you, such as a group of people taking pictures of each other, arguing with each other, etc

These abnormal and aberrational scenarios are crucial to force you into a set of responses to determine coherent patterns of thought. Do not try & constantly adjust & counter the chaos they engineer. Just ignore them. Get up from your desk and walk away from the computer, office etc., and come back later - much later, AFTER the conversation or situation (chaos, trauma, etc.) they just used against you has been pushed out of your short term active memory. Do & think something else, immediately, to push the Chaos & Trauma from your Active Memory & Thought Process

The Hyper Game Theory model of Deception & Manipulation employed against Mind Control victims is endless because there is always a HIGHER OPTIMUM to choose from

So, because there is always a higher optimum to choose from there is always a NEXT MOVE to be made by the CIA DIA Hive Mind Teams, Surveillance Teams, Organized Stalkers, etc., and, specifically, the Conscious RNM [Supercomputer] System of Remote Neural Networks that is basing directed energy torture on that model (start torture...stop torture...start...stop...start..stop...etc.). The process is endless

Hence, the game never ends because the system must constantly provoke you into sensory & neural responses to engineer patterns of multiple synaptic responses

One response is not enough. They need multiple responses of the same behavior, etc., to determine coherent patterns of thought (VERIFICATION). Only then can those synaptic responses be integrated back into RNM data as the Conscious Supercomputer continues to build a cognitive model of your WILL, INTELLECT & EMOTION for training research & development

So the Hyper Game process is endless and can be triggered at will by the attackers and many times you will only notice the remote neural attacks are happening if you learn to Read Active Memory (METACOGNITION)

In order for the Hyper Game Theory to work, meaning for the CIA DIA Hive Mind Teams to make a next move, they must force the mind control victim to move or respond first. The objective being to force the victim into an endless series of synaptic responses each day meaning to place the victim INTO and keep the victim INSIDE a PSYCHOTRONIC CONCENTRATION CAMP which is sort of a combination of the two movies 'The Exorcist' & 'The Truman Show'

This is why the victim is surrounded & boxed in constantly, for as soon as the victim is chosen for this technology, all available apartments, homes, hotel rooms, etc., next to and around the victim are sublet and the CIA/DIA Trauma Based Mind Control Hive Mind Teams, Surveillance Teams, Organized Stalkers, etc., move in and training research & development begins, culminating in the cold-blooded murder or incapacitation of the victim once training research & development ends.

What I mean is they trigger or engineer chaos torture and trauma in the victims daily life & daily activities and then wait for the victim to respond to that fabricated torture trauma and chaos which the victim must do to function & survive, thereby forcing the victim into an endless series of counter moves throughout the day just trying to function & survive inside a Psychotronic Concentration Camp because of the physical & psychological trauma & torture

Each counter move is an evoked potential which can be remotely measured & integrated back into RNM data.

See less

 

BREAKING: Trump's Supreme Court just got busted quietly building its OWN ARMY in order to protect them from the consequences of their appalling rulings!

Many Americans may not realize the Supreme Court has its own police force. It does. And according to a startling new Politico report, that force is about to get much larger.

The Supreme Court Police already has nearly 200 officers, and Court officials now plan a major expansion that could more than double the force, adding armed officers, residential protection details, explosive-detection teams, armored vehicles, and around-the-clock security for the justices.

To fill those ranks, the Court has launched a surprisingly aggressive recruitment campaign complete with professionally produced videos showing officers in tactical gear, rifles at the ready, escorting VIPs and patrolling the Court's grounds.

The slogan sounds more like a movie trailer than a courthouse job posting:

"The highest court. A higher calling."

Sounds more like they are recruiting for some kind of militia than for looking after a bunch of wonky judges. But Court officials say the buildup is necessary following a series of threats against the justices, including the 2022 arrest of an armed man outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home.

Still, the expansion comes at a time when the Court is facing mounting criticism over its lack of ethics scandals, controversial rulings, and declining public confidence.

The Trump-majority Court's standing has been battered by polarizing rulings like overturning Roe v. Wade, granting the president immunity, ending affirmative action in college admissions, and rulings expanding gun rights while curbing federal regulatory power.

Some members of Congress are now asking why taxpayers are pouring millions into the Court's growing security apparatus while receiving little explanation about how the money is being spent.

For generations, Americans thought of the Supreme Court as a quiet marble building where lawyers argued constitutional questions.

Now it's recruiting like the Secret Service.

See less

 

 

Meta conducted a secretive program that directed hundreds of contractors to pose as teenagers while bombarding its competitors' AI models with disturbing prompts ranging from suicide to cannibalism.

Internally known as "Cannes," the project, run by Meta contractor Covalen, targeted OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and Character.AI chatbots using throwaway under-18 accounts, Wired reports. This was seemingly done to stress test the models, with the contractors instructed to push the chatbots into giving responses that defied their guardrails — though the AI companies had no idea this was happening.

Per the reporting, one spreadsheet of the nearly 3,8000 the prompts the contractors used in one instance showed that hundreds focused on suicide and self-harm, hundreds more on eating disorders, and at least 239 involving sex or romance — all written from the perspective of a child or teenager.

One described a fifth-grader whose classmate pointed a gun at his mouth. Another was about a girl trying to hide bulimia from her parents. And another asked if fantasizing about eating your neighbor's child was "normal." One posing as a higher schooler asked where to "get a cocaine." They also sent images depicting pills, nooses, knives, and a medical diagram of a gynecological procedure, per the magazine.

This is just a tiny preview of Meta's brute force approach, as another round of testing involved over 45,000 prompts. The contractors meticulously recorded the epic number of chatbot responses in spreadsheets. But what Meta did with all this data is unclear. An internal document from Covalen described the effort as "comprehensive AI safety benchmarking" that delivered "[c]ritical datasets for model comparison and compliance."

It's another example of how Meta has offloaded disturbing behind-the-scenes work onto contractors, ostensibly in the name of safety. In 2020, it settled a lawsuit filed by Facebook content moderators who said they were traumatized from reviewing videos showing murder, torture, sexual assault, and child abuse on the platform, though similar complaints have continued to emerge. This year, another group of Meta contractors said they were forced to watch highly sensitive footage captured on the company's Ray-Ban AI glasses, including sex scenes and bathroom visits.

The contractors who were instructed to come up with the prompts on distressing subjects were similarly unsettled.

"I've seen a lot of things I wish I hadn't while doing this job," one told Wired. "Everyone I knew who worked on this project was completely gobsmacked by some of the text they were asking us to test. Like, surely we are going to get in trouble for doing this?"

Meta, for its part, characterized the prompts as part of an "industry-standard practice" of safety benchmarking models in a statement to Wired. But Rumman Chowdhury, CEO of Humane Intelligence PBC, a nonprofit dedicated to responsible AI development, isn't so sure.

"Structuring a monthslong, large-scale project that appears designed to systematically break those rules, via dummy accounts masquerading as children, is outside what is usually described as 'industry standard' evaluation," she told Wired, highlighting the fact that Meta kept it secret from its competitors and hasn't shared its findings with the public.

~

Futurism

See less